Title
Hickok Manufacturing Co., Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-44707
Decision Date
Aug 31, 1982
The Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeals' ruling that a foreign corporation cannot cancel a trademark registration due to a lack of likelihood of confusion from differing goods and trade channels.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-44707)

Facts:

  • The case involves Hickok Manufacturing Co., Inc. (petitioner) and Santos Lim Bun Liong (respondent).
  • Decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on August 31, 1982, under G.R. No. L-44707.
  • The dispute centers on the trademark "HICKOK," registered by both parties for different products.
  • The petitioner registered the trademark for non-competing items such as leather wallets, belts, men's briefs, neckties, handkerchiefs, and men's socks, manufactured by Quality House, Inc.
  • The respondent registered the same trademark for shoes produced in Marikina, Rizal, Philippines.
  • The Director of Patents initially ruled in favor of the petitioner, canceling the respondent's trademark registration.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed this decision, stating the trademarks were distinct and the goods were not in direct competition.
  • The petitioner appealed to the Supreme Court to reinstate the Director of Patents' decision.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, upholding the respondent's trademark registration for shoes.
  • The Court found no error in the appellate ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court's ruling was based on established legal principles regarding trademark registration and likelihood of confusion.
  • The Court emphasized that competing trademarks do not need to be identical; the entirety of the trademarks, including design, color, and the nature of the goods, must be considered.
  • The petitioner’s trademark was for various leather goods, while the respondent’s was exclusively for shoes, which are unrelated products.
  • The Court re...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.