Title
Heirs of Ypon vs. Ricaforte
Case
G.R. No. 198680
Decision Date
Jul 8, 2013
Petitioners sought cancellation of title, claiming heirship to Magdaleno Ypon’s estate; SC ruled heirship must be determined in a special proceeding, not an ordinary civil action, affirming dismissal.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 198680)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Titles
    • Petitioners – Heirs of Magdaleno Ypon: Alvaro Ypon, Erudita Y. Baron, Cicero Ypon, Wilson Ypon, Victor Ypon, Hinidino Y. Peñalosa.
    • Respondents – Gaudioso Ponteras Ricaforte a.k.a. Gaudioso E. Ypon; Register of Deeds of Toledo City.
  • Original Ownership and Transfers
    • Magdaleno Ypon died intestate and childless on June 28, 1968, leaving Lot Nos. 2-AA, 2-C, 2-F, and 2-J under TCT Nos. T-44 and T-77-A.
    • Gaudioso claimed to be the sole heir, executed an Affidavit of Self-Adjudication, caused cancellation of the foregoing titles, and caused re-issuance of TCT Nos. T-2637 and T-2638 in his name.
  • Civil Case No. T-2246
    • On July 29, 2010, petitioners (with cousins) filed a Complaint for Cancellation of Title and Reconveyance with Damages against Gaudioso.
    • Gaudioso’s Answer asserted his sonship: supported by a birth certificate, letters from Polytechnic School, and a passport; he also pleaded lack of cause of action, failure to state cause of action, and absence of real parties in interest.
  • RTC Proceedings
    • July 27, 2011 – RTC dismissed Civil Case No. T-2246 for failure to state a cause of action, finding Gaudioso a compulsory heir based on documentary proof (marriage contract of Magdaleno, live birth certificate, 1960 letter, passport).
    • August 31, 2011 – Motion for reconsideration denied for counsel’s failure to indicate MCLE compliance date.
  • Petition for Certiorari
    • Aggrieved petitioners filed a Rule 45 petition raising a pure question of law on the propriety of the dismissal.

Issues:

  • Whether the RTC properly dismissed Civil Case No. T-2246 for failure to state a cause of action.
  • Whether heirship may be determined in an ordinary action for cancellation of title or must be resolved in a special proceeding.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.