Title
Heirs of Lasam vs. Umengan
Case
G.R. No. 168156
Decision Date
Dec 6, 2006
Dispute over possession of inherited land in Tuguegarao; CA ruled Vicenta Umengan had better right due to valid deeds, prior possession, and invalid unprobated will.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 168156)

Facts:

  • Identity of the Subject Property
    • Eastern half of Lot No. 5427 (OCT No. 196, 1,037 sq m) and Lot No. 990 (OCT No. 1032, 118 sq m) in Tuguegarao City, Cagayan, with an area of 554 sq m.
    • Originally registered in the names of spouses Pedro Cuntapay and Leona Bunagan; June 14, 1979 Deed of Confirmation conveyed both lots to their daughters Irene and Isabel Cuntapay; December 28, 1979 Partition Agreement awarded the eastern half to heirs of Isabel and western half to heirs of Irene.
  • Parties’ Family and Title Transactions
    • Isabel Cuntapay’s children by first husband Domingo Turingan: Abdon, Sado (deceased), Rufo and Maria; by second husband Mariano Lasam: Trinidad and Rosendo.
    • 1955: Rosendo Lasam allowed Vicenta Umengan (daughter of Abdon) to occupy the lot upon promise to vacate; June 14, 1961: Rufo sold his 1/6 share (Doc. No. 539) and Abdon donated his 1/6 share (Doc. No. 538) to Vicenta; March 3, 1975: Abdon purchased the shares of Maria and Sado (Doc. No. 88).
  • Procedural History
    • January 2001: Heirs of Rosendo Lasam filed unlawful detainer in MTCC Branch III, Tuguegarao City, seeking ejectment of Vicenta Umengan.
    • MTCC (Nov. 21, 2001): Gave effect to a newly discovered “Testamento Abierto” of Isabel bequeathing her share to Rosendo; ordered ejectment, P500/month rentals, P20,000 attorney’s fees.
    • RTC (Aug. 29, 2003): Affirmed MTCC decision in toto.
    • CA (Feb. 16, 2005): Upheld MTCC jurisdiction but set aside lower courts’ decisions; held will invalid for non-compliance with formalities, recognized respondent’s better right via deeds and prior possession; dismissed complaint.
    • CA Resolution (May 17, 2005): Denied motion for reconsideration.
    • SC (Dec. 6, 2006): Denied petition for review (G.R. No. 168156), affirming CA.

Issues:

  • Whether the validity of an unprobated will may be inquired into in an unlawful detainer proceeding, or whether the action is limited to physical possession.
  • Whether the purported Testamento Abierto of Isabel Cuntapay validly vested a better right of possession in the heirs of Rosendo Lasam over Vicenta Umengan.
  • Whether the dismissal of respondent’s partition case (Civil Case No. 4917) operates as res judicata against her claim of title or possession.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.