Title
Heirs of Ferdid Roxas vs. Heirs of Melania Roxas
Case
G.R. No. 254452
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2024
Heirs of Ferdinand Roxas challenged a CA ruling declaring the land as part of Melania Roxas's estate, reversing an RTC decision that favored them, ultimately establishing a trust relationship regarding land ownership.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 125539)

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • Petitioners: Heirs of Ferdinand A. Roxas (Angela Margarita T. Roxas, Dyan Paula T. Roxas, Michael Jude T. Roxas, Maria Katrina T. Roxas).
    • Respondents: Heirs of Melania Roxas (Manuel A. Roxas, Maria Rosario Roxas-Ureta, Alexander A. Roxas, Salome Roxas-Pantaleon, Paul Gerardo Roxas, Elaine Roxas-Gamboa, Ma. Imelda Roxas-Cruz, David Anthony Roxas).
    • Antonio Roxas and Melania Roxas are parents of Ferdinand and the other heirs.
  • Property and Transaction
    • In 1970, Felicisma Garcia (Melania's cousin) executed a Deed of Absolute Sale (DOAS) for a 500 sqm land in Loakan, Baguio City.
    • The title was issued in Ferdinand's name (TCT No. T-16657).
    • Melania built a house on the lot; family used it as a vacation house and residence.
  • Possession and Use
    • Melania rented part of the property to Alfredo Sison (1990–1995).
    • Paul Roxas started residing there in 1991 with his family.
  • Deaths
    • Antonio Roxas died April 1, 1995.
    • Ferdinand died September 18, 2004.
    • Melania died January 1, 2011.
  • Litigation Initiation
    • On November 11, 2014, Heirs of Melania filed a complaint to declare the DOAS void and cancel Ferdinand's title.
    • Allegations: Melania was the true purchaser but placed title in Ferdinand's name to protect children’s interests given Antonio's illegitimate children.
    • Heirs of Ferdinand countered that Ferdinand is true owner, purchased with help from parents, paid taxes, allowed Melania to rent and use property.
  • Family Corporation and Donations
    • Antonio and Melania transferred assets to family corporation Mel-Rox Realty Inc. in 1988.
    • In 1997, a "Donation Document" was executed, distributing properties/money among children; Ferdinand received the subject property, others received money or property.
  • Trial Court (RTC) Decision
    • Dismissed Complaint of Melania's Heirs for lack of merit.
    • Held transaction not simulated; Ferdinand held title in his name as owner.
    • Found valid contract; Melania and Antonio were true purchasers but gave subject property to Ferdinand.
    • Heirs of Melania acted in bad faith; ordered them to pay attorney's fees.
  • Court of Appeals (CA) Decision
    • Reversed RTC decision.
    • Declared DOAS a relatively simulated contract; Melania was true owner.
    • Ordered cancellation of Ferdinand's title and issuance of a new title in Melania's name.
    • Held donation to Ferdinand invalid for failing formal donation requirements.
    • Ruled Ferdinand held subject lot in trust for Melania per Article 1448 of the Civil Code.
  • Petition to the Supreme Court
    • Heirs of Ferdinand filed petition challenging CA ruling.
    • Argued Donation Document confirmed ownership in Ferdinand.
    • Asserted possession of title, tax payments and other evidence prove ownership.
    • Claimed Heirs of Melania failed to prove trust or ownership claim.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that Ferdinand was merely holding the subject lot in trust for Melania.
  • Whether the disputed property was donated to Ferdinand by Melania under the presumptions of Article 1448 of the Civil Code.
  • Whether compliance with formal donation requirements under Articles 748 and 749 of the Civil Code is necessary in a presumed donation under Article 1448.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.