Title
Hacbang vs. Alo
Case
G.R. No. 191031
Decision Date
Oct 5, 2015
Bishop Sofronio's will validly probated; petitioners, collateral relatives, lack legal interest in disputed lot, no standing to challenge title.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 191031)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Decedent and Testamentary Dispositions
    • Bishop Sofronio Hacbang died on April 3, 1937, survived by his parents (Basilio and Maria) and siblings (Perfecto, Joaquin, Lucia Teresita, and Dolores).
    • His will (Ultima Voluntad y Testamento) devised one-half of his estate to his parents and the other half to his sister Dolores, identifying specific properties including Lot 8-A, Block 17, 1,403 sqm in San Juan, Rizal (the subject lot).
  • Probate, Registry and Revival Proceedings
    • The will was admitted to probate by the Court of First Instance of Manila on May 21, 1937 (SP. PROC. No. 51199); the case was archived on November 2, 1957, and a motion to revive was denied on May 23, 1975.
    • On September 24, 1971, TCT No. 169342 over the subject lot was issued in the name of Atty. Basilio H. Alo; its origin and relationship to prior titles remained unclear.
  • Litigation on Title Cancellation
    • On February 1, 1999, petitioners Dolores L. Hacbang and Bernardo J. Hacbang filed before the RTC (Civil Case No. Q-99-36660) to cancel TCT No. 169342 as fraudulently secured, supported by an LRA investigator’s report.
    • The RTC dismissed the petition on January 7, 2003 for lack of standing; the CA affirmed this dismissal on October 13, 2009, and denied reconsideration on January 21, 2010. The Supreme Court granted a petition for review on certiorari.

Issues:

  • Validity and Status of Title
    • Whether the CA erred in not ruling on the intrinsic validity of TCT No. 169342.
    • Whether the title should be canceled for alleged fraud or irregularity.
  • Succession and Party-in-Interest
    • Whether the probate proceedings were dismissed rather than merely archived, triggering intestate succession.
    • Whether petitioners, as grandchildren of decedent’s siblings, are real parties in interest entitled to contest respondent’s title.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.