Title
Grieg Philippines, Inc. vs. Gonzales
Case
G.R. No. 228296
Decision Date
Jul 26, 2017
Seafarer Gonzales, diagnosed with leukemia after exposure to benzene onboard, won disability benefits as courts ruled his illness work-related, affirming compensability.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 228296)

Facts:

  • Employment History and Contractual Background
    • Gonzales was first hired by Grieg Philippines, Inc. in 2010.
    • He was re-hired on April 20, 2013, for a nine‑month contract and was deployed to the general cargo vessel Star Florida.
    • This deployment marked his third contract with Grieg.
    • His employment was governed by the Associated Marine Officers’ and Seaman’s Union of the Philippines Collective Bargaining Agreement.
    • Prior to deployment, he underwent a Pre-Employment Medical Examination and was certified fit for sea duty.
  • Onset of Illness and Initial Medical Encounters
    • In August 2013, while aboard Star Florida, Gonzales experienced symptoms including shortness of breath, left leg pain, fatigue, fever, and headaches.
    • He was advised to take paracetamol and rest, and a week later, he sought further medical attention in South Korea with normal test results leading to his return to work.
    • The following month, his symptoms reappeared, compounded by the presence of black tarry stools.
    • He was confined in an Indonesian hospital where he was initially diagnosed with “pancytopenia suspect aplastic anemia,” declared unfit for sea duty, and repatriated on October 8, 2013.
  • Subsequent Medical Developments and Diagnosis
    • Upon repatriation, Gonzales was admitted to the Metropolitan Medical Center where company physicians later diagnosed him with acute promyelocytic leukemia.
    • The company physicians maintained that his leukemia was not work‑related; however, Grieg continued to cover his treatment expenses for humanitarian reasons.
    • Allegations arose that Gonzales had suddenly stopped consulting company physicians, which he countered by stating that he had informed Grieg of his inability to attend an appointment due to travel constraints.
    • Gonzales obtained a second opinion from an independent physician, Dr. Emmanuel Trinidad, who certified that his leukemia was work‑related.
  • Filing of the Disability Claim and Subsequent Proceedings
    • After his disability claims were denied, Gonzales filed a complaint against Grieg before the Labor Arbiter on July 15, 2014.
    • On November 28, 2014, the Labor Arbiter found that his leukemia was work‑related and that it rendered him permanently incapacitated for seafaring, awarding him US$90,000 in disability benefits, US$2,262 as a sickness allowance, and attorney’s fees.
    • Grieg appealed the decision before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), which affirmed the Labor Arbiter’s ruling on May 25, 2015 and denied Grieg’s motion for reconsideration.
  • Grieg’s Arguments on Appeal
    • In its Petition for Certiorari before the Court of Appeals, Grieg challenged:
      • The reliance on Gonzales’ mere allegations that his condition was work‑related by the NLRC.
      • The departure from established Supreme Court rulings regarding the disputable presumption of work‑relation.
      • The awarding of attorney’s fees despite the alleged absence of evidence demonstrating bad faith or malice.
    • Grieg further argued that Gonzales failed to prove a direct causal link between his illness and his duties as an Ordinary Seaman, and that his alleged “medical abandonment” weakened his disability claim.
  • Court of Appeals Decision and Findings
    • The Court of Appeals upheld the decisions of both the Labor Arbiter and the NLRC.
    • The Court ruled that with leukemia included among the occupational diseases under Section 32‑A of the POEA‑Standard Employment Contract, the employer bore the burden to prove that the illness was not work‑related.
    • It noted that even if leukemia were not considered an occupational disease per se, Section 20-A, paragraph 4 created a disputable presumption favoring the seafarer.
    • The decision affirmed the awarding of Gonzales’ disability benefits, sickness allowance, and attorney’s fees.

Issues:

  • Whether the NLRC committed grave abuse of discretion by relying solely on Gonzales’ allegations that his condition was work‑related without requiring further evidence.
    • Whether the mere existence of a disputable presumption is sufficient for establishing work‑relation.
    • Whether Grieg’s contention that Gonzales did not meet the four requirements under the POEA Contract was meritless.
  • Whether the NLRC erred in awarding attorney’s fees despite the absence of evidence of bad faith or malice on the part of Grieg.
    • The issue of whether the awarding of such fees was in line with the established legal standards.
  • Whether Gonzales sufficiently established that his work as an Ordinary Seaman, involving constant exposure to harmful chemicals (including those containing benzene), was a reasonable contribution or aggravation factor to his contracted acute promyelocytic leukemia.
    • The evidentiary weight of his job description, official records, and the second opinion provided by the independent physician.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.