Title
Government Service Insurance System vs. Spouses Labung-Deang
Case
G.R. No. 135644
Decision Date
Sep 17, 2001
GSIS is held liable for damages for failing to return the owner's duplicate copy of the title, resulting in a court awarding temperate damages to the Labung-Deang couple but not attorney's fees.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 135644)

Facts:

  • In December 1969, Gonzalo (deceased) and Matilde Labung-Deang obtained a PHP 8,500 housing loan from the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS).
  • The loan was secured by a real estate mortgage on their property covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 14926-R, set to mature on December 23, 1979.
  • The spouses deposited the owner's duplicate copy of the title with GSIS as per the mortgage deed requirement.
  • On January 19, 1979, the spouses fully settled their debt and requested the return of the owner's duplicate copy to secure a new PHP 50,000 loan from a private lender, Milagros Runes.
  • GSIS personnel failed to locate the title despite diligent search efforts.
  • GSIS initiated reconstitution proceedings in 1979 and released the reconstituted title on June 26, 1979.
  • The spouses filed a complaint for damages against GSIS on July 6, 1979, claiming the delay hindered them from obtaining the new loan, resulting in financial loss.
  • The Regional Trial Court of Angeles City ruled in favor of the spouses on July 31, 1995, awarding PHP 20,000 in temperate damages, PHP 15,000 in attorney's fees, legal interest, and costs of the suit.
  • GSIS appealed, but the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision on September 21, 1998.
  • GSIS subsequently brought the case to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that GSIS is liable for damages and denied the petition for lack of merit.
  • The Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals with ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court held that the sixth paragraph of Article 2180 of the Civil Code, which exempts the State from vicarious liability for the acts of its employees, does not apply to GSIS.
  • GSIS, as a GOCC with a separate legal personality, is liable for damages caused by its employees acting within the scope of their tasks.
  • The obligation of GSIS arose from a pre-existing contract with the spouses Deang, specifically the loan agreement secured by a real estate mortgage.
  • The duty to return the owner's duplicate copy of the title arose upon the release of ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.