Case Digest (G.R. No. L-29493)
Facts:
Government Service Insurance System v. Government Service Insurance System Supervisor's Union, G.R. No. L-29493, December 29, 1975, First Division, Esguerra, J., writing for the Court; consolidated with G.R. Nos. L-29186, L-31311 and L-32735. The petition(s) were petitions to review by certiorari of several orders and resolutions of the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) involving certification, injunctive relief, unfair labor practice findings, and the suspension of a Government Corporate Counsel memorandum.
Petitioner GSIS challenged a CIR order dated August 4, 1967 (CIR Case No. 1591‑MC), which certified GSIS Supervisors' Union (GSISSU) as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative for GSIS employees occupying positions in pay classes 7 to 13. The CIR based certification on extensive evidentiary findings (job descriptions, organization charts, prior recognition and practice) and an en banc affirmation (Resolution, Oct. 16, 1967). GSIS sought review in G.R. No. L‑29493.
After the CIR certification, GSISSU sought a preliminary injunction (CIR Case No. 1591‑MC(1)) when GSIS issued Office Orders Nos. 34 and 35 (Feb. 1968) implementing a partial reassignment of supervisory personnel; the CIR (Feb. 24, 1968) ordered the parties to maintain the status quo pending resolution of jurisdictional and certification issues. GSIS moved for reconsideration; CIR denied it and GSIS brought certiorari in G.R. No. L‑29186.
While the main certification order and the status‑quo order were pending in this Court, GSISSU filed an unfair labor practice petition (CIR Case No. 87‑IPA; G.R. No. L‑31311) alleging GSIS refusal to bargain, discriminatory conditioning of salary differentials on suspension of bargaining (the Sept. 27, 1968 agreement), and union‑busting. The CIR (June 4, 1969) declared the Sept. 27 agreement null and void for discriminatory imposition, found GSIS guilty of discrimination under R.A. 875, Sec. 4(a) sub‑par. 4, and ordered GSIS to bargain in good faith; GSIS sought certiorari in G.R. No. L‑31311.
Finally, GSISSU sought relief (CIR Case No. 87‑IPA(10); G.R. No. L‑32735) to restrain enforcement of a Government Corporate Counsel Memorandum Circular (June 3, 1970) directing lawyers in legal departments of government corporations to sever union membership. The CIR (July 17, 1970) held enforcement of that memorandum in abeyance pending this Court’s resolution of the certification appeal, reasoning that enforcement would impair the bargaining unit’s composition and industrial peace. GSIS brought certiorari in G.R. No. L‑32735.
All four matters were treated as related; the Supreme Court considered whether (a) the CIR properly certified GSISSU as bargaining ...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Did the Court of Industrial Relations have jurisdiction to certify the GSISSU as the bargaining representative of GSIS employees in pay classes 7–13 and to issue provisional status‑quo orders related to that certification?
- Was the CIR’s certification of GSISSU as the appropriate and exclusive bargaining unit for pay classes 7–13 supported by evidence and within its discretion?
- Was the CIR correct in declaring the September 27, 1968 agreement null and void and in finding GSIS guilty of discrimination/unfair labor practices and ordering GSIS to bargain in good faith?
- Was the CIR justified in holding in abeyance the ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)