Title
Government of the United States of America vs. Purga
Case
G.R. No. 148571
Decision Date
Sep 24, 2002
U.S. sought Jimenez's extradition; SC ruled no right to notice, hearing, or bail in extradition, except in exceptional circumstances, emphasizing treaty obligations.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 148571)

Facts:

Petitioner, the Government of the United States of America, represented by the Philippine Department of Justice, filed a Petition for Extradition in the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 42 (docketed May 18, 2001) seeking the arrest of Mark B. Jimenez a.k.a. Mario Batacan Crespo pursuant to the RP‑US Extradition Treaty and PD No. 1069. The RTC, presided by Judge Guillermo G. Purganan, set for hearing the issuance of a warrant (Order dated May 23, 2001) after which it issued a warrant and granted bail (Order dated July 3, 2001; P1,000,000), prompting this Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65, Rules of Court to annul the hearing requirement, cancel bail, and take Jimenez into custody.

Issues:

  • Is a prospective extraditee entitled to notice and a hearing before a warrant for arrest may be issued?
  • Is a prospective extraditee entitled to bail and provisional liberty while extradition proceedings are pending?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.