Title
Government of the Philippine Islands vs. Philippine Steamship Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 18957
Decision Date
Jan 16, 1923
Collision between *Isabel* and *Antipolo* due to mutual negligence; *Antipolo*'s owner held solidarily liable for lost rice under Article 827, Code of Commerce.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-22684)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

1. Incident Overview
On February 10, 1920, the coastwise vessel Isabel, equipped with motor and sails, departed Manila for Balayan, Batangas, carrying 911 sacks of rice owned by the Government of the Philippine Islands. The rice was consigned to destinations in the south.

2. Collision Details
At approximately 2:00 AM on February 11, 1920, near the San Nicolas Light at the entrance of Manila Bay, the Isabel and the Antipolo, another coastwise vessel owned by the Philippine Steamship Co., Inc., collided. Both vessels were traveling at about 6 miles per hour and were approximately 1.5 to 2 miles apart when they first sighted each other.

3. Actions Leading to Collision

  • The mate of the *Antipolo*, upon realizing the danger, correctly turned the helm hard to starboard.
  • The mate of the *Isabel*, however, panicked and turned the helm hard to port, causing the vessel to veer into the path of the *Antipolo*.
  • Despite the *Antipolo* stopping its engines, the *Isabel* continued at full speed, resulting in a collision near the bows. The *Isabel* sank, resulting in the total loss of the vessel and its cargo, though the crew was rescued.

4. Negligence Findings

  • The *Antipolo* was negligent for allowing the vessel to approach the *Isabel* too closely without giving it a wide berth.
  • The *Isabel* was negligent for the incorrect handling of the vessel at the critical moment, likely due to the mate's exhaustion from continuous duty.

Issues:

  • Whether both vessels were at fault for the collision.
  • Whether the Philippine Steamship Co., Inc., as the owner of the *Antipolo*, is liable for the loss of the rice owned by the Government of the Philippine Islands.
  • Whether Article 827 of the Code of Commerce applies to the case, particularly in determining liability when both vessels are at fault.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.