Title
Gonzales vs. Narvasa
Case
G.R. No. 140835
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2000
A petitioner challenged the constitutionality of the PCCR and presidential appointees, but the Court ruled the PCCR issue moot, denied standing, and upheld the right to information on public matters.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 140835)

Facts:

  • Petition, parties and reliefs sought
    • Ramon A. Gonzales, as citizen and taxpayer, filed a petition for prohibition and mandamus on December 9, 1999, assailing:
      • Constitutionality of the Preparatory Commission on Constitutional Reform (PCCR) created by Executive Order No. 43 (E.O. No. 43) and extended by Executive Order No. 70 (E.O. No. 70).
      • Constitutionality of seventy (70) positions in the Office of the President occupied by twenty (20) presidential consultants, twenty-two (22) presidential advisers, and twenty-eight (28) presidential assistants.
      • Enforcement by Executive Secretary Ronaldo B. Zamora of actions, advice, and recommendations of the PCCR and the presidential consultants/advisers/assistants.
      • Audit and disbursement of public funds by the Commission on Audit for the PCCR and the consultants/advisers/assistants.
      • Compelling respondent Zamora to furnish information on appointments and recipients of seized luxury vehicles.
    • Respondent Hon. Andres R. Narvasa, as PCCR Chairman, filed a Comment on January 28, 2000; other respondents, represented by the Solicitor General, filed a Comment on March 7, 2000. A Consolidated Reply was filed on April 24, 2000, and the case was submitted for decision.
  • Preparatory Commission on Constitutional Reform (PCCR) timeline
    • E.O. No. 43 (November 26, 1998) created the PCCR to study and recommend amendments to the 1987 Constitution, instructing completion by June 30, 1999 (sec. 8).
    • E.O. No. 70 (February 19, 1999) amended the time frame, extending completion to December 31, 1999, with submission of report within 15 working days thereafter (sec. 6).
    • PCCR submitted its recommendations on December 20, 1999, was dissolved the same day, and had exhausted its P3 million operational fund sourced from the Office of the President.
  • Presidential consultants, advisers, assistants
    • In 1995–1996, the President purportedly created seventy positions in the Office of the President and appointed consultants, advisers and assistants, as listed in the Philippine Government Directory.
    • Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of such creations without alleging the enabling executive act or his personal injury.
  • Request for information
    • Petitioner’s letter dated October 4, 1999 requested:
      • Names and appointment copies of executive officials holding multiple positions.
      • List of recipients of luxury vehicles seized by the Bureau of Customs and turned over to Malacañang.
    • Basis of right: Section 7, Article III, 1987 Constitution and Republic Act No. 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees).

Issues:

  • Whether the creation of the PCCR by executive orders is constitutional and justiciable.
  • Whether the creation of presidential consultants, advisers and assistants by the President is constitutional and properly before the Court.
  • Whether petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling Executive Secretary Zamora to furnish requested information under the constitutional right to information.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.