Title
Supreme Court
Genorga vs. Heirs of Meliton
Case
G.R. No. 224515
Decision Date
Jul 3, 2017
Co-owners dispute possession of owner’s duplicate title after partial land sales; SC affirms respondents' preferential right due to buyers' delay in registration compliance.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 224515)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Property
    • Julian Meliton and co-heirs (Isabel Meliton, Irene, Henry, Roberto, Haide/Haidi, Ma. Fe Meliton Espinosa) are registered co-owners of a 227,270-sqm parcel (Lot 1095-C, Concepcion Pequeña, Naga City) under TCT No. 8027.
    • Co-ownership shares: Julian – 8/14; each other heir – 1/14.
  • Sales by Julian Meliton
    • During his lifetime, Julian sold specific portions of the subject land to various buyers, including petitioner’s husband, Gaspar Geaorga. The buyers took possession, introduced improvements, and paid realty taxes.
    • Julian refused to surrender the owner’s duplicate copy of TCT No. 8027, preventing buyers from registering their deeds of sale.
  • Proceedings in RTC Civil Case No. 96-3526 (1996)
    • Buyers filed a Petition (Mar 18, 1996) for surrender of the owner’s duplicate TCT No. 8027, annulment of the title, and issuance of new titles under Sec. 107, PD 1529.
    • RTC Decision (Jul 17, 1998) ordered:
      • Holder (Ma. Fe or any heir) to surrender owner’s duplicate to RD-Naga.
      • RD-Naga to annotate deeds of sale and issue new certificates of title.
      • If non-compliance, declare TCT No. 8027 null and void and issue new titles.
    • Decision became final (Sept 10, 2006) but unexecuted due to failure to locate Ma. Fe for service.
    • RTC Order (Oct 2, 2008) declared TCT No. 8027 null and void; new title issued and annotated; owner’s duplicate given to petitioner (2009).
  • Proceedings in RTC Civil Case No. 2013-0036
    • Respondents filed Complaint (Apr 22, 2013) to compel petitioner’s surrender of the owner’s duplicate title, with damages.
    • Petitioner’s Answer (May 30, 2013) claimed she held the duplicate per court order for the purpose of completing registration requirements. Title was submitted to RD-Naga on Sept 13, 2013.
    • RTC Decision (Jul 28, 2014) granted respondents’ petition, ordering petitioner/RD-Naga to deliver the owner’s duplicate to respondents. Motion for reconsideration denied (Sept 11, 2014).
  • Proceedings in the Court of Appeals
    • CA Decision (Oct 7, 2015) in CA-G.R. CV No. 103591 affirmed the RTC ruling, finding no valid reason to withhold the duplicate title from respondents.
    • CA Resolution (Apr 12, 2016) denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.
  • Petition to the Supreme Court
    • Petitioner filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari challenging the CA Decision and Resolution, raising the issue of proper custody and delivery of the owner’s duplicate title.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals correctly affirmed the RTC’s Decision directing the surrender and delivery of the owner’s duplicate copy of TCT No. 8027 to respondents.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.