Title
Gatmaytan vs. Misibis Land, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 222166
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2020
Petitioners claim ownership of disputed land, alleging fraud in subsequent sales; Supreme Court allows trial, citing imprescriptible reconveyance due to possession.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 175760)

Facts:

  • Early Transactions and Registration
    • December 9, 1991 – Petitioners Mercedes Gatmaytan and Erlinda Valdellon purchase a 6.4868-ha parcel (TCT No. T-77703) from Spouses Oscar and Cidra Garcia; they pay documentary and capital gains taxes.
    • April 6, 1992 – Petitioners register and annotate their Deed of Absolute Sale (1991 DOAS) on TCT No. T-77703 but cannot obtain a new title for lack of DAR clearance.
  • Subsequent Transfers and Discovery
    • February 21, 1996 – Spouses Garcia execute a 1996 DOAS in favor of DAA Realty Corporation; TCT No. T-97059 is issued on February 22, 1996.
    • April 21, 2005 – DAA Realty sells to Misibis Land, Inc. (MLI); TCT No. T-138212 is issued.
    • 2010 – Petitioners resume transfer efforts; discover the lot consolidated and subdivided under multiple new titles, TCT No. T-77703 cancelled, and file an Affidavit of Adverse Claim (September 1, 2010).
  • RTC Proceedings (Civil Case No. T-2820)
    • December 10, 2014 – Petitioners file complaint against Spouses Garcia, DAA Realty, MLI, and Philippine National Bank for:
      • Declaration of ownership and nullity of the 1996 and 2005 DOAS;
      • Cancellation of TCT Nos. T-97059 and T-138212;
      • Quieting of title;
      • Accounting of profits;
      • Moral and exemplary damages; attorney’s fees.
    • MLI raises as defenses: innocent purchaser for value; prescription (10 years from 1996 issuance); lack of correct docket fees.
    • October 22, 2015 – RTC dismisses complaint for prescription and failure to pay correct fees.
    • December 28, 2015 – RTC denies petitioners’ motion for reconsideration.
  • Supreme Court Proceedings
    • January 2016 – Petitioners receive RTC orders; move for extension to file Rule 45 petition.
    • February 24, 2016 – Petition for review on certiorari filed.
    • April 18, 2016 – SC Second Division denies petition for form defects.
    • August 22, 2016 – SC en banc grants reconsideration; petition reinstated; MLI comments; petitioners reply.

Issues:

  • Whether petitioners’ complaint should proceed to trial on the merits.
  • Whether petitioners’ causes of action are already barred by prescription.
  • Whether petitioners’ alleged failure to pay correct docket fees is fatal.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.