Title
Garvida vs. Sales, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 124893
Decision Date
Apr 18, 1997
A 21-year-old candidate exceeded the age limit for SK Chairman, leading to a legal dispute over COMELEC jurisdiction and eligibility, ultimately invalidating her candidacy.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 217158)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Registration and initial proceedings
    • On March 16, 1996, petitioner Lynette G. Garvida applied to register as a member and voter of the Katipunan ng Kabataan (KNK) of Barangay San Lorenzo, Bangui, Ilocos Norte; the Board of Election Tellers denied her application for being over 21 years old under Sec. 3(b) of COMELEC Resolution No. 2824.
    • Petitioner filed a “Petition for Inclusion as Registered Kabataang Member and Voter” with the Municipal Circuit Trial Court, which, in a decision dated April 18, 1996, ordered her registration; the Board appealed to the Regional Trial Court, whose presiding judge inhibited himself.
  • Candidacy, challenges, and election
    • On April 23, 1996, petitioner filed her certificate of candidacy (COC) for SK Chairman; the local Election Officer disapproved it for age, but the COMELEC Regional Director reversed.
    • Rival candidate Florencio G. Sales, Jr. filed with the COMELEC en banc a “Petition for Denial and/or Cancellation of Certificate of Candidacy” by fax and registered mail on April 29, 1996, alleging petitioner’s disqualification for exceeding the age limit.
    • On May 2, 1996, the COMELEC en banc—without referring the case to a Division and before due notice—ordered the suspension of petitioner’s proclamation if she won and required her to file ten copies of the petition.
    • Election day, May 6, 1996: petitioner received 78 votes, Sales 76 votes; the Board did not proclaim petitioner due to the May 2 order but later, on June 2, 1996, proclaimed her winner “without prejudice.”
    • Petitioner also ran and won as Auditor of the Pambayang Pederasyon ng mga Sangguniang Kabataan on July 5, 1996.

Issues:

  • Whether the COMELEC en banc had jurisdiction to entertain and decide the petition to deny or cancel petitioner’s COC.
  • Whether petitioner’s COC could be cancelled on the ground that she exceeded the maximum age requirement for SK elective officials.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.