Title
Gana-Carait y Villegas vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 257453
Decision Date
Aug 9, 2022
A dual citizen by birth challenged COMELEC's disqualification ruling; SC reversed, affirming her eligibility without R.A. 9225 compliance.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 115324)

Facts:

  • Parties and Proceedings
    • Petitioner Mariz Lindsey Tan Gana-Carait (Gana-Carait) filed on 17 October 2018 her Certificate of Candidacy (CoC) as Member of the Sangguniang Panlungsod of Biñan City, Laguna, for the 13 May 2019 National and Local Elections.
    • On 22 October 2018, respondent Rommel Mitra Lim filed a petition to disqualify Gana-Carait, alleging she acquired U.S. citizenship and did not renounce it before seeking office.
    • On 6 November 2018, respondent Dominic P. NuAez filed a petition to deny due course to or cancel her CoC for alleged material misrepresentation that she was eligible to run despite holding U.S. citizenship.
    • Gana-Carait answered and moved to consolidate both petitions.
  • COMELEC Resolutions
    • On 27 February 2019, the COMELEC First Division resolved to dismiss the disqualification petition but granted cancellation of Gana-Carait’s CoC, finding her a dual citizen by naturalization who failed to comply with RA 9225’s renunciation and oath requirements.
    • Gana-Carait filed a Motion for Partial Reconsideration on 5 March 2019.
    • On 23 September 2021, the COMELEC En Banc denied her motion for lack of merit and affirmed the First Division.
  • Supreme Court Petition and Proceedings
    • Petitioner filed on 12 October 2021 a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition under Rule 64 in relation to Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, assailing the COMELEC En Banc Resolution as a grave abuse of discretion.
    • The COMELEC issued a Certificate of Finality and Writ of Execution (Dec 2021–Jan 2022), but the Supreme Court found the En Banc resolution not yet final due to the timely petition.
    • The Court consolidated issues of finality, scope of RA 9225, dual citizenship by birth versus naturalization, and material misrepresentation.

Issues:

  • Finality and Jurisdiction
    • Whether the COMELEC En Banc Resolution became final and executory before the timely Rule 64 petition.
    • How to harmonize COMELEC procedural rules with the Constitution and Rules of Court on the 30-day period to seek certiorari.
  • Applicability of RA 9225
    • Whether RA 9225’s oath of allegiance and renunciation requirements apply to natural-born Filipinos who acquired foreign citizenship by birth.
    • Distinction between dual citizenship by birth and by naturalization under Philippine and U.S. law.
  • Material Misrepresentation
    • Whether Gana-Carait made a false representation in her CoC that she was eligible to run for office.
    • Whether her dual citizenship status, without renunciation or separate oath, rendered her ineligible.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.