Title
Supreme Court
Gamboa vs. Teves
Case
G.R. No. 176579
Decision Date
Jun 28, 2011
A PLDT stockholder challenged the sale of PTIC shares to First Pacific, alleging it violated the 40% foreign ownership limit in public utilities. The Supreme Court ruled "capital" refers only to common shares, excluding non-voting preferred shares, and emphasized national interest in maintaining Filipino control.

Case Digest (A.C. No. 7922)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of PLDT and PTIC
    • On 28 November 1928, Act No. 3436 granted PLDT a 50-year franchise to operate telecommunications services.
    • In 1969, GTE sold 26% of PLDT’s common shares to Philippine Telecommunications Investment Corporation (PTIC).
  • PHI Sequestration and Government Ownership
    • Prime Holdings, Inc. (PHI) acquired 111,415 PTIC shares (46.125%) in 1977 by assignment from private shareholders.
    • In 1986, the PCGG sequestered those shares; by 2006, the Supreme Court declared them owned by the Republic.
  • Privatization of PTIC Shares
    • In 1999, First Pacific acquired the remaining 54% of PTIC’s equity.
    • On 8 December 2006, a public bidding for the Republic’s 46.125% PTIC equity was held: Parallax won with a P25.217 billion bid.
    • First Pacific failed to complete first refusal by the original deadline but later, through its affiliate MPAH, executed a Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement on 14 February 2007 at the same price.
    • The sale was consummated on 28 February 2007 when MPAH paid P25.217 billion and received the 111,415 PTIC share certificates.
  • Effect on PLDT Ownership
    • PTIC holds 13.847% of PLDT’s common shares, so the 46.125% PTIC equity sale equated to an indirect 6.3% PLDT share sale.
    • First Pacific’s PLDT common shareholding rose from 30.7% to 37%, and total foreign common shareholdings in PLDT to about 64.27%.
    • Petitioner alleges this breaches Section 11, Article XII of the 1987 Constitution limiting foreign ownership of public utilities to 40% of their capital.
  • Procedural History
    • On 28 February 2007, Wilson P. Gamboa, a PLDT stockholder, filed a petition for prohibition, injunction, declaratory relief, and nullity of sale.
    • Petitioners-in-intervention Pablito V. Sanidad and Arno V. Sanidad joined Gamboa’s suit.
    • Respondents include Finance Secretary Teves, Undersecretary Sevilla, PCGG Commissioner Abcede, PLDT executives, the SEC Chairperson, and the PSE President.
    • The core contention involves the proper meaning of “capital” in Section 11, Article XII of the Constitution.

Issues:

  • Jurisdiction and Standing
    • Does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction over petition for prohibition, injunction, declaratory relief, and annulment of sale?
    • Does petitioner Gamboa have locus standi to invoke those remedies?
  • Substantive Constitutional Question
    • Does “capital” in Section 11, Article XII refer only to shares entitled to vote (common and any voting preferred) or to total outstanding capital stock (common + non-voting preferred)?
    • Does the sale of PTIC shares resulting in foreign ownership of PLDT common equity exceeding 40% violate Section 11, Article XII?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.