Title
Funa vs. Agra
Case
G.R. No. 191644
Decision Date
Feb 19, 2013
Agra’s concurrent appointments as Acting Secretary of Justice and Acting Solicitor General were ruled unconstitutional, violating the 1987 Constitution’s prohibition on multiple offices for Cabinet members, though his actions remained valid under the de facto officer doctrine.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 191644)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Antecedents
    • On January 12, 2010, Alberto C. Agra was Government Corporate Counsel and was designated Acting Solicitor General by President Arroyo in place of Solicitor General Devanadera.
    • On March 1, 2010, Devanadera resigned as Secretary of Justice to run for Congress; on March 5, 2010, President Arroyo designated Agra as Acting Secretary of Justice while he continued as Acting Solicitor General.
    • On April 7, 2010, Dennis A.B. Funa filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition challenging the constitutionality of Agra’s concurrent designations under Section 13, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution.
    • During pendency of the suit, President Aquino appointed Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz as Solicitor General; Cadiz assumed office on August 5, 2010.
  • Contentions of the Parties
    • Petitioner argues Section 13, Article VII prohibits any Cabinet member or deputy from holding another office—even in an acting capacity—and that Solicitor General is not ex officio to the Justice Secretary.
    • Respondents contend Agra’s roles were temporary designations conferring duties only, not “holding” dual offices; invoke hold-over principle and OSG autonomy; assert no salary drawn from OSG after March 5, 2010.
    • Petitioner replies there is no special circumstance exempting Agra; temporariness does not override constitutional ban; hold-over doctrine improperly invoked; Administrative Code mandates OSG independence.

Issues:

  • Primary Issue
    • Did Agra’s concurrent designation as Acting Secretary of Justice and Acting Solicitor General violate the constitutional prohibition against holding multiple offices by Cabinet members under Section 13, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.