Title
Fullero vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 170583
Decision Date
Sep 12, 2007
Petitioner Ernesto M. Fullero is convicted for falsifying a public document, as the prosecution presents evidence of his act of falsification and his legal obligation to disclose the truth, leading to his conviction and the affirmation of the jurisdiction of the RTC of Legazpi City.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 170583)

Facts:

  • Case: Fullero v. People (G.R. No. 170583)
  • Date: September 12, 2007
  • Petitioner: Ernesto M. Fullero
  • Conviction: Falsifying a public document under paragraph 4, Article 171 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • Position: Acting Chief Operator, Bureau of Telecommunications Office (BTO), Iriga City.
  • Accusation: Falsifying Personal Data Sheet (PDS) by claiming he passed the Civil Engineering Board Examination in May 1985 with a rating of 75.8%.
  • Discovery: Verification with the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) revealed Fullero failed the board exams in May 1984 and May 1985.
  • Trial Court: Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Legazpi City found Fullero guilty, sentenced to six to ten years imprisonment, fined P3,000.
  • Appeal: Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC decision on October 19, 2005.
  • Petition: Fullero filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Supreme Court Decision: Denied the petition and affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals, upholding Fullero's...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Elements of Crime Established: Prosecution sufficiently established all elements of falsification of a public document.
  • Untruthful Statements: Fullero made false statements in his PDS, which he was legally obliged to disclose accurately.
  • Intent: Wrongful intent to injure a third person is not necessary for the crime of falsification of public documents.
  • Evidence: Prosecution's evidence, including testimonies and documents, were admissible and credible.
  • Jurisdiction: Allegation that the falsification occurred in Lega...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.