Title
Fule vs. De Legare
Case
G.R. No. L-17951
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1963
Emilia's property fraudulently sold by her son; buyers declared innocent purchasers in good faith under Torrens system, upheld by Supreme Court.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-17951)

Facts:

  • Ownership and Encumbrance
    • Emilia E. de Legare owned a house and lot at No. 146 Sta. Mesa Boulevard Extension, San Juan, Rizal (TCT No. 21253), and lived there with her adopted son John W. Legare and maid Purita Tarrosa.
    • On September 26, 1951, she mortgaged the property to Tomas Q. Soriano for ₱8,000 (first-class mortgage, recorded). By February 23, 1953, the debt was reduced to ₱7,000 but not annotated on the title.
  • Fraudulent Conveyance to Adopted Son
    • On March 29, 1953, an intruder threatened Emilia for ₱10,000. After he left, John induced Emilia and Purita to sign a paper he claimed was a U.S. Veterans Administration application. It was actually a deed of sale conveying the property to John for ₱12,000, acknowledged April 7, 1953.
    • Emilia and Purita hid at the Windsor Hotel until May 7–8, 1953. Upon return, they found strangers in the house and learned of the fraudulent sale.
  • Sale to the Petitioners (Fule & Aragon)
    • Broker Elias B. Fermin arranged sale to spouses Conrado C. Fule and Lourdes E. Aragon for ₱12,000, with the ₱7,000 mortgage assumed by the buyers. On May 9, 1953, Soriano sold the property to the spouses, who then mortgaged it back to him for ₱7,000.
    • The Register of Deeds recorded:
      • The deed of Emilia → John, issuing TCT No. 30126.
      • The deed of John → Fule & Aragon, issuing TCT No. 30127.
      • The mortgage to Soriano.
    • After registration, the spouses paid the balance of the purchase price (≈₱4,000).
  • Proceedings Below
    • Trial Court ordered cancellation of TCT Nos. 30126 & 30127, reinstated TCT No. 21253 with Soriano’s mortgage, delivered possession to Emilia, awarded damages, attorney’s fees, and cross-claim relief.
    • Court of Appeals modified: revived TCT No. 21253 with reduced ₱7,000 mortgage annotation; eliminated attorney’s fees against Fule & Aragon; affirmed other relief.

Issues:

  • Were spouses Fule and Aragon purchasers in good faith and for value of the property?
  • Does registration under the Torrens system render a fraudulent deed a valid root of title for subsequent purchasers?
  • Does Article 1434, Civil Code, vest title in an innocent purchaser when a non-owner vendor later acquires registered title?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.