Title
Floro Galorio y Gapas vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 254531
Decision Date
Feb 19, 2024
Petitioner stabbed Andres Muring during a fiesta altercation, claiming self-defense. Court ruled against him, affirming Homicide conviction due to unproven self-defense and lack of unlawful aggression.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 254531)

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
    • Petitioner Floro Galorio y Gapas was charged with homicide under Article 249, RPC, accused of stabbing Andres Muring to death on May 24, 2006 in Alicia, Bohol.
    • OPP-Bohol issued a resolution finding probable cause the same day, and Information was filed September 4, 2006.
    • RTC Branch 51, Carmen, Bohol arraigned Galorio on January 8, 2007; after multiple pre-trial and trial settings, the court convicted him of homicide on July 28, 2015 and imposed 6 years–1 day to 12 years’ imprisonment.
    • CA 20th Division denied his appeal on February 22, 2019 (affirmed with modifications awarding P50,000 civil indemnity and moral damages), and denied reconsideration on August 28, 2020.
  • Underlying Facts and Evidence
    • Incident: During a fiesta coronation, petitioner scolded victim’s son over a parked motorcycle; victim arrived with a bolo, allegedly threatened (“patay?”) and hacked petitioner and nephews Erik and Rother.
    • Petitioner suffered a severed ring finger and abdominal wounds; nephews sustained multiple wounds; petitioner retrieved a bayonet from his motorcycle toolbox and stabbed the victim once in the right lower armpit, causing fatal liver penetration.
    • Forensic reports: Death certificate (hypovolemic shock secondary to stab wound); police report and affidavits of eyewitnesses described victim’s initial aggression and petitioner’s defensive reaction.
  • Trial and Appellate Findings
    • RTC credited prosecution witness Leoncio Cagande’s account that victim bumped into a motorcycle and fell before being stabbed, discounted self-defense theory as lacking detail, and speculated petitioner and relatives were armed and had planned the encounter.
    • CA upheld conviction, ruling unlawful aggression ceased when victim fell, and petitioner’s bayonet use was retaliatory, not justifiable self-defense or defense of relative.

Issues:

  • Justiciability
    • Whether issues raised on certiorari involve purely questions of law or require factual reappraisal.
  • Speedy Trial
    • Whether petitioner’s right to a speedy disposition under the 1987 Constitution and R.A. 8493 was violated by repeated and unexplained delays.
  • Justifying Circumstances
    • Whether the elements of defense of a relative (unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity of means, no provocation by defender) were present to acquit petitioner.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.