Title
FISHER vs. TRINIDAD
Case
G.R. No. 17518
Decision Date
Oct 30, 1922
Shareholder disputes stock dividend taxation, claiming it's capital, not income. Supreme Court rules stock dividends are capital, reversing lower court; tax refund granted.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 17518)

Facts:

  • Background
    • In 1919 the Philippine American Drug Company, a corporation duly organized under Philippine law, conducted business in Manila.
    • Frederick C. Fisher (appellant) was a shareholder; Wenceslao Trinidad (appellee) was Collector of Internal Revenue.
  • Transaction and litigation
    • For the year 1919 the corporation declared a stock dividend; appellant’s share amounted to ₱24,800, evidenced by additional stock certificates.
    • In March 1920 appellant paid under protest ₱889.91 as income tax on the stock dividend and sued for recovery. The appellee demurred; the lower court sustained the demurrer, dismissing the petition. Appellant appealed.

Issues:

  • Primary Issue
    • Whether “stock dividends” are “income” taxable under Section 25 of Act No. 2833.
  • Subsidiary Issues
    • Whether Philippine Act No. 2833 departs meaningfully from U.S. income‐tax statutes.
    • Whether the Philippine Legislature may, by definition, treat capital items as income.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.