Case Digest (G.R. No. 147406)
Facts:
- Venancio Figueroa y Cervantes (petitioner) was charged with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide.
- The charge was filed on July 8, 1994, in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bulacan, Branch 18, under Criminal Case No. 2235-M-94.
- The incident occurred on January 16, 1994, in Bocaue, Bulacan, where the petitioner, driving a bus, allegedly caused the death of Rodolfo Lopez y Amparado due to negligent driving.
- The RTC convicted the petitioner on August 19, 1998, sentencing him to imprisonment and ordering damages to the victim's heirs.
- The petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), raising the issue of RTC's jurisdiction for the first time.
- The CA ruled on February 28, 2001, that the petitioner was estopped by laches due to his prior active participation in the trial.
- The CA affirmed the conviction but modified the penalty and damages.
- The petitioner filed a petition for review on certiorari, questioning the applicability of laches and the validity of the conviction.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court granted the petition for review and dismissed Criminal Case No. 2235-M-94 without prejudice.
- The Court found that the petitioner was not estopped by laches in questioning the RTC's jurisdiction, as he raised the issue in his appeal without significant delay. ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court emphasized that jurisdiction is a matter of law and cannot be conferred by consent or through estoppel.
- A lack ...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 147406)
Facts:
The case involves Venancio Figueroa y Cervantes (petitioner) against the People of the Philippines (respondent). On July 8, 1994, an information for reckless imprudence resulting in homicide was filed against the petitioner in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bulacan, Branch 18, under Criminal Case No. 2235-M-94. The incident occurred on January 16, 1994, in Bocaue, Bulacan, where the petitioner, as the driver of a bus, allegedly caused the death of Rodolfo Lopez y Amparado due to negligent driving. The trial commenced, and on August 19, 1998, the RTC convicted the petitioner, sentencing him to imprisonment and ordering him to pay damages to the victim's heirs.
Dissatisfied with the conviction, the petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), where he raised, for the first time, the issue of the RTC's jurisdiction over the case. The CA, in its decision dated February 28, 2001, ruled that the petitioner was estopped by laches from questioning the RTC's jurisdiction due to his active participation in the trial without raising the issue earlier. The CA affirmed the conviction but modified the penalty and damages awarded. The petitioner subsequently filed a petition for review on certiorari, questioning the applicability of laches and the validity of the conviction based on several legal grounds.
Issue:
- Does the failure of the petitioner to raise the issue of jurisdiction during ...