Title
Figueroa y Cervantes vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 147406
Decision Date
Jul 14, 2008
The Supreme Court dismisses the case without prejudice, ruling that the petitioner is not barred by laches from asserting a lack of jurisdiction in his appeal.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 147406)

Facts:

  • Venancio Figueroa y Cervantes (petitioner) was charged with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide.
  • The charge was filed on July 8, 1994, in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bulacan, Branch 18, under Criminal Case No. 2235-M-94.
  • The incident occurred on January 16, 1994, in Bocaue, Bulacan, where the petitioner, driving a bus, allegedly caused the death of Rodolfo Lopez y Amparado due to negligent driving.
  • The RTC convicted the petitioner on August 19, 1998, sentencing him to imprisonment and ordering damages to the victim's heirs.
  • The petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), raising the issue of RTC's jurisdiction for the first time.
  • The CA ruled on February 28, 2001, that the petitioner was estopped by laches due to his prior active participation in the trial.
  • The CA affirmed the conviction but modified the penalty and damages.
  • The petitioner filed a petition for review on certiorari, questioning the applicability of laches and the validity of the conviction.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the petition for review and dismissed Criminal Case No. 2235-M-94 without prejudice.
  • The Court found that the petitioner was not estopped by laches in questioning the RTC's jurisdiction, as he raised the issue in his appeal without significant delay.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that jurisdiction is a matter of law and cannot be conferred by consent or through estoppel.
  • A lack ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.