Case Digest (G.R. No. 203756)
Facts:
In FGU Insurance Corporation vs. G.P. Sarmiento Trucking Corporation and Lambert M. Eroles (G.R. No. 141910, August 6, 2002), FGU Insurance Corporation (FGU), as subrogee of Concepcion Industries, Inc., sought reimbursement of ₱204,450.00 after paying for damage to thirty (30) Condura S.D. white refrigerators shipped on June 18, 1994. The goods, loaded on a truck owned by G.P. Sarmiento Trucking Corporation (GPS) and driven by Lambert M. Eroles, overturned into a canal along McArthur Highway in Bamban, Tarlac, following a collision with an unidentified vehicle. FGU filed a complaint for damages and breach of contract of carriage in the Regional Trial Court of Makati City, alleging GPS was a common carrier and thus prima facie negligent under Article 1735 of the Civil Code (1987 Constitution). GPS answered that it was a private carrier, exclusively hauling for Concepcion since 1988, and asserted the mishap was accidental. After FGU presented its proofs of loss, GPS successfully mCase Digest (G.R. No. 203756)
Facts:
- Contract of Carriage
- On 18 June 1994, G.P. Sarmiento Trucking Corporation (GPS) agreed to transport thirty (30) Condura S.D. white refrigerators from Concepcion Industries, Inc.’s plant in Alabang, Metro Manila, to Central Luzon Appliances in Dagupan City.
- The goods were loaded on an Isuzu truck driven by Lambert M. Eroles, GPS’s employee.
- Accident and Damage
- While traversing the north diversion road along McArthur Highway in Barangay Anupol, Bamban, Tarlac, the Isuzu truck collided with an unidentified vehicle.
- The collision caused the truck to fall into a deep canal, resulting in damage to the thirty refrigerators.
- Insurance, Subrogation, and Proceedings
- FGU Insurance Corporation (FGU), insurer of the cargo, paid Concepcion Industries, Inc. P204,450.00 as full indemnity for the damaged goods and was subrogated to Concepcion’s rights.
- FGU filed a complaint for damages and breach of contract of carriage against GPS and its driver Lambert Eroles in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati City after GPS failed to settle the claim.
- At trial, FGU established the amount of damage and its subrogation status; GPS demurred to evidence, asserting it was not a common carrier and that the damage was accidental.
- The RTC granted GPS’s demurrer to evidence and dismissed FGU’s complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed. FGU appealed to the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Whether GPS qualifies as a common carrier under law and jurisprudence.
- Whether GPS, as either a common or private carrier, may be presumed negligent for damage to goods in its custody.
- Whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies to hold GPS or its driver liable.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)