Title
Ferndale Homes Homeowners Association, Inc. vs. Spouses Abayon
Case
G.R. No. 230426
Decision Date
Apr 28, 2021
Spouses Abayon contested liability for pre-ownership association dues, interest, and penalties on Ferndale Homes lots. Courts ruled they inherited dues via property liens, reduced rates, and denied damages.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 126560)

Facts:

  • Parties and Subject Matter
    • Ferndale Homes Homeowners Association Inc. (FHHAI) is the homeowners' association of a residential subdivision project located in Barangay Pasong Tamo, Quezon City.
    • Spouses Harlin Cast Abayon and Daryl Grace Abayon (Spouses Abayon) are purchasers and owners of several lots within Ferndale Homes, thereby becoming members of FHHAI.
  • Property Transactions and Ownership
    • Ferndale Homes Lots 1 to 8 in Block 2, Phase 4B were sold on various dates to Salud C. Abayon, Spouses Abayon, and Ladislawa A. Castro.
    • By a Deed of Exchange dated March 18, 2005, Salud and Castro bartered some lots within Ferndale Homes with the properties of Spouses Abayon in Cebu City.
    • Spouses Abayon thus acquired ownership of Lots 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, among others.
  • Membership and Obligations to FHHAI
    • As property owners, Spouses Abayon became members of FHHAI and were required to pay association dues, including those dues that allegedly accrued prior to their acquisition of Lots 1, 3, 4 and 5.
    • FHHAI imposed and charged a 24% per annum interest and an 8% per annum penalty on late payments of association dues.
  • Payments Under Protest and Claims
    • Spouses Abayon paid association dues, interests, and penalties for Lots 1 to 8 under protest, as detailed in the amounts paid corresponding to principal assessments and interests/penalties.
    • In December 2013, Spouses Abayon filed a complaint before the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB) seeking reimbursement of association dues that accrued before their acquisition of certain lots, as well as a refund of interests and penalties which they claimed to be unauthorized and excessive.
    • Specifically, they sought reimbursement for association dues on Lots 1, 3, 4, and 5 that accrued prior to their acquisition dates, totaling approximately ₱68,777.11.
    • They also contended that the imposed rates of 24% interest and 8% penalty per annum were oppressive, unconscionable, and unjust.
  • FHHAI Position
    • FHHAI maintained the authority to impose dues, interest, and penalties based on the Deed of Restrictions, House Rules, and By-Laws accepted by all lot owners, including successors-in-interest such as Spouses Abayon.
    • FHHAI argued that unpaid dues constituted liens on the property that bind subsequent owners.
  • HLURB Ruling and Subsequent Proceedings
    • HLURB Regional Office Arbiter ruled in favor of Spouses Abayon:
      • Determined no obligation on successors-in-interest to pay dues accrued before acquisition.
      • Reduced interest on late payments from 24% to 6% per annum.
      • Deleted the 8% per annum penalty as duplicative.
      • Ordered FHHAI to refund amounts paid for interests and penalties prior to 2007, as well as dues accrued prior to acquisition.
      • Awarded exemplary damages (₱50,000) and attorney’s fees (₱25,000).
    • The HLURB Board of Commissioners denied FHHAI’s appeal for procedural lapses in posting a surety bond.
    • FHHAI elevated the case to the Court of Appeals.
  • Court of Appeals Decision
    • The Court of Appeals reversed the HLURB judgment, ruling:
      • Spouses Abayon are liable for association dues accrued prior to their acquisition based on the Deed of Restrictions and the concept of liens.
      • Reduced interest rate to 12% per annum and penalty to 6% per annum.
      • Ordered FHHAI to reimburse interests and penalties paid in excess of these rates.
      • Dismissed claims for reimbursement of dues and claims for damages, attorney’s fees, and litigation expenses.
  • Supreme Court Petitions
    • Spouses Abayon filed a petition seeking reinstatement of the HLURB rulings, arguing:
      • FHHAI did not comply with surety bond requirements.
      • They are not liable for unpaid dues of predecessors-in-interest since no lien was properly annotated and by-laws do not impose such liability on successors.
      • Interest and penalty rates are unauthorized and excessive.
      • The Court of Appeals improperly deleted damages and attorney’s fees.
    • FHHAI filed a petition assailing the reduction of interest and penalty rates.

Issues:

  • Did FHHAI comply with the surety bond requirement under the 2011 Revised Rules of Procedure of the HLURB?
  • Are Spouses Abayon liable for association dues which accrued prior to their acquisition of Lots 1, 3, 4 and 5?
  • Are Spouses Abayon liable for interests and penalties on late payment of association dues? If so, what are the proper rates?
  • Are Spouses Abayon entitled to exemplary damages and attorney’s fees?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.