Title
Evardone vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 94010
Decision Date
Dec 2, 1991
Mayor Evardone challenged COMELEC's recall process; Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's authority but barred recall due to proximity to next election.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 94010)

Facts:

  • Origin and Parties
    • Two consolidated petitions:
      • G.R. No. 94010 – Felipe Evardone vs. COMELEC et al., petition for prohibition with urgent prayer for a restraining order/preliminary injunction.
      • G.R. No. 95063 – Alexander Apelado et al. vs. COMELEC and Mayor Evardone, petition for certiorari to review COMELEC resolutions nullifying the recall signing.
    • Felipe Evardone was elected Mayor of Sulat, Eastern Samar in the 1988 local elections and assumed office upon proclamation.
  • Recall Proceedings and COMELEC Actions
    • February 14, 1990: Apelado et al. filed a petition for recall with the Local Election Registrar of Sulat, Eastern Samar.
    • May 23, 1990: COMELEC promulgated Resolution No. 2272, prescribing general rules for the recall of local officials under Batas Pambansa Blg. 337.
    • June 20, 1990: COMELEC En Banc Resolution No. 90-0557 approved the Election Registrar’s recommendation to hold the signing of the recall petition on July 14, 1990.
  • Supreme Court Proceedings
    • July 10, 1990: Evardone filed his petition for prohibition (G.R. No. 94010) to enjoin the July 14 signing.
    • July 12, 1990: The Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) directing respondents to cease the signing; central office received notice the same day.
    • July 14, 1990: Signing proceeded in good faith; about 2,050 of 6,090 registered voters (≈34%) signed the petition.
    • July 26, 1990: COMELEC En Banc Resolution No. 90-0660 nullified the signing as violative of the TRO.
    • August 29, 1990: COMELEC denied motion for reconsideration via Resolution No. 90-0777, holding that service on the Commission’s principal sufficed.
    • The two petitions were consolidated for resolution.

Issues:

  • Validity of COMELEC Resolution No. 2272
    • Whether Article X, Section 3 of the 1987 Constitution repealed B.P. 337, rendering Resolution No. 2272 unconstitutional.
    • Whether COMELEC had jurisdiction and rule-making authority to promulgate recall rules pending a new Local Government Code.
  • Effect of the TRO on the Signing Process
    • Whether the TRO issued July 12 rendered nugatory the July 14 signing despite the field agent’s notice arriving after the event.
    • Whether the signing in good faith may be invalidated or unwound.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.