Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-91-758)
Facts:
- In "Estoya v. Abraham-Singson," decided on September 26, 1994, Atty. Ernesto B. Estoya and other complainants filed a sworn letter-complaint against Judge Marvie R. Abraham-Singson.
- The complaint was signed by forty-seven officers and employees from various branches of the Regional Trial Court in San Jose, Antique.
- Complainants included personnel from the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor, the Provincial Probation and Parole Office, and the Office of the Citizens District Attorney of the Public Assistance Office.
- They accused Judge Abraham-Singson of treating her staff in a "dictatorial and terroristic manner," creating a working atmosphere dependent on her fluctuating moods.
- Allegations included being oppressive and dictatorial towards lawyers, litigants, and the general public, and failing to comply with the rule on continuous trial mandated by the Supreme Court.
- The complainants sought her removal from Antique, supported by affidavits detailing her erratic behavior and gross incompetence in handling judicial duties.
- The case was referred to Associate Justice Pedro Ramirez of the Court of Appeals for investigation, who found substantial evidence supporting the allegations.
- The investigation revealed that Judge Abraham-Singson exhibited gross ignorance of the law, gross incompetence, and grave misconduct, leading to her dismissal from service.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled that Judge Marvie R. Abraham-Singson is guilty of gross ignorance of the law, gross incompetence, and grave misconduct.
- Consequently, she was dismissed from service with forfeiture of all leave and ret...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision was based on substantial evidence presented by the complainants, which Judge Abraham-Singson failed to refute.
- Evidence demonstrated her gross ignorance of the law through multiple instances of incorrect application of legal principles and procedures.
- Examples included incorrectly considering unlawful aggression as a mitigating circumstance, improperly applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, and promulgating de...continue reading
Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-91-758)
Facts:
In the case of "Estoya v. Abraham-Singson," decided on September 26, 1994, Atty. Ernesto B. Estoya and other complainants filed a sworn letter-complaint against Judge Marvie R. Abraham-Singson, the Presiding Judge of Branch 10, Regional Trial Court of Antique. The complaint was signed by forty-seven officers and employees from various branches of the Regional Trial Court in San Jose, Antique, including the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor, the Provincial Probation and Parole Office, and the Office of the Citizens District Attorney of the Public Assistance Office. The complainants accused Judge Abraham-Singson of treating her staff in a "dictatorial and terroristic manner," creating a working atmosphere dependent on her fluctuating moods. They also alleged that she was oppressive and dictatorial towards lawyers, litigants, and the general public, and failed to comply with the rule on continuous trial mandated by the Supreme Court. The complainants sought her removal from Antique. The complaint included affidavits detailing her erratic behavior and gross incompetence in handling judicial duties. The case was referred to Associate Justice Pedro Ramirez of the Court of Appeals for investigation, who found substantial evidence supporting the allegations. The investigation revealed that Judge Abrah...