Case Digest (G.R. No. 189081) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Gloria S. Dy v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 189081, decided August 10, 2016 under the 1987 Constitution, petitioner Gloria S. Dy, former General Manager of Mandy Commodities Co., Inc. (MCCI), was entrusted by MCCI’s President, William Mandy, to facilitate and manage a ₱20 million loan from the International China Bank of Commerce (ICBC) secured by a chattel mortgage over leased warehouses in Numancia. After MCCI began to default, Mandy delivered to Dy thirteen Allied Bank and twelve Asia Trust Bank checks, totaling ₱21,706,281.00, with instructions to use them for loan payments. Dy testified she encashed the checks and returned cash to Mandy, but ICBC foreclosed the property. In October 2002, MCCI filed an estafa complaint; in March 2004, information was filed in the Manila RTC. Following trial, the RTC acquitted Dy of estafa for failure to prove misappropriation beyond reasonable doubt but, invoking civil liability ex delicto, nevertheless ordered her to pay the tota Case Digest (G.R. No. 189081) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background and Transaction
- Gloria S. Dy was General Manager of Mandy Commodities Company, Inc. (MCCI).
- In May 1996, she proposed to President William Mandy the purchase of Pantranco property, leading Mandy to secure a ₱20,000,000 loan from International China Bank of Commerce (ICBC).
- Loan Management and Checks
- MCCI executed a chattel mortgage over warehouses as security; Dy was entrusted to manage loan repayments.
- Upon default and notice of foreclosure in February 1999, Mandy gave Dy 25 “payable to cash” checks totaling ₱21,706,281 to prevent foreclosure, instructing her to apply them to the ICBC loan.
- Dy testified she encashed the checks and returned the proceeds to Mandy; ICBC ultimately foreclosed for nonpayment.
- Criminal Proceedings and Civil Liability
- In October 2002, MCCI filed an estafa complaint; an information was lodged against Dy in March 2004.
- RTC Manila (Nov. 11, 2005) acquitted Dy for failure to prove misappropriation or conversion beyond reasonable doubt, finding the transaction a loan contract; nonetheless, it ordered her to pay ₱21,706,281 in civil liability.
- On appeal, the Court of Appeals (Feb. 25, 2009) affirmed the civil liability award, ruling that acquittal on reasonable doubt does not preclude civil liability if preponderance of evidence warrants it.
Issues:
- Whether civil liability ex delicto may be awarded in a criminal estafa case when the accused is acquitted for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
- Whether a contractual obligation (civil liability ex contractu) falls within the “mandatory fusion” of criminal and civil actions under the Rules of Court.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)