Title
Dungo vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 209464
Decision Date
Jul 1, 2015
Fraternity members convicted under Anti-Hazing Law for inducing neophyte’s death during initiation; circumstantial evidence affirmed guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 209464)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • Petitioners: Dandy L. Dungo and Gregorio A. Sibal, Jr., members of Alpha Phi Omega (APO) Theta Chapter.
    • Respondent: People of the Philippines.
    • Charged under Republic Act No. 8049 (Anti-Hazing Law) for hazing of neophyte Marlon Villanueva resulting in death.
  • Procedural History
    • February 2006: Information and Amended Information filed in RTC, Calamba City.
    • Motions to quash denied; petitioners pleaded not guilty; trial ensued.
    • February 23, 2011 RTC Decision: convicted petitioners of Section 4, RA 8049; sentenced to reclusion perpetua.
    • April 26, 2013 CA Decision and October 8, 2013 CA Resolution: affirmed RTC verdict.
    • Petition for review on certiorari filed with the Supreme Court under Rule 45.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • Medico-legal testimony
      • Dr. Ramon Masilungan (ER physician): multiple contusions, cyanosis; opined hazing injuries.
      • Dr. Roy Camarillo (PNP Crime Lab): autopsy found subdural hemorrhage; retrieved APO-marked matchsticks.
    • Eyewitness identification and events
      • Susan Ignacio (store owner): saw petitioners and 20–plus persons arrive at resort on January 13, 2006; positively identified Dungo and Sibal.
      • Donato Magat (tricycle driver): saw petitioners carry an unconscious man from resort to tricycle; brought him to hospital.
      • Hospital security (Espina, Natividad): logged petitioners under false names as those who brought victim to ER.
      • PO2 Ignacio (PNP): observed contusions on victim; arrested petitioners at hospital.
    • Fraternity context
      • Gay Czarina Sunga (UPLB student): saw Dungo and Sibal in UPLB Biological Sciences tambayan; witnessed victim’s bruising and petitioners’ conduct.
      • Other testimonies: no official initiation notice filed; administrative disciplinary case initiated at UPLB.
  • Defense Evidence
    • Denial and alibi by Dungo and Sibal
      • Dungo: with girlfriend Rivera at boarding house, did not attend rites; only went to resort after 2 a.m. to help victim.
      • Sibal: left initiation site when rites canceled; returned later to assist victim to hospital.
    • Corroborative witnesses: Rivera, Cornelio, Gopez—fellow fraternity brothers and Dungo’s girlfriend.
    • Claim: no conspiracy; petitioners did not plan or actively participate in hazing.
  • Rulings Below
    • RTC: found presence and actions of petitioners at resort; held defenses of denial and alibi self-serving; convicted under Sec. 4, RA 8049.
    • CA: affirmed conviction; upheld circumstantial evidence; ruled presence and inducement sufficient for liability.

Issues:

  • Whether the Amended Information charged an offense different from that proved at trial (actual participation vs. inducement).
  • Whether the prosecution sufficiently established conspiracy among petitioners and other fraternity members.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.