Title
DKC Holdings Corp. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 118248
Decision Date
Apr 5, 2000
A 14,021 sqm land in Valenzuela, leased with option to buy by DKC Holdings, became disputed after owner Encarnacion Bartolome’s death. Heir Victor Bartolome refused to honor the contract. SC ruled the contract binds Victor, ordering possession to DKC and title annotation.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 118248)

Facts:

  • Parties and Contract
    • DKC Holdings Corporation (petitioner) entered on March 16, 1988 into a Contract of Lease with Option to Buy with Encarnacion Bartolome for a 14,021 sqm lot in Malinta, Valenzuela.
    • Terms: reservation fee of ₱3,000/month for two years; option exercisable by written notice within two years; lease for six years at ₱15,000/month (renewable for another six years at ₱18,000/month) upon exercise.
  • Succession and Title Transfer
    • Encarnacion died January 1990; petitioner continued paying reservation fees to Victor U. Bartolome (sole heir), who refused them.
    • Victor executed an Affidavit of Self-Adjudication; Register of Deeds cancelled TCT No. B-37615 and issued TCT No. V-14249 in Victor’s name.
  • Exercise of Option and Registry Refusal
    • March 14, 1990: petitioner served notice of exercise of option to lease and tendered ₱15,000 rent; Victor refused payment and possession.
    • Petitioner deposited rents and reservation fees into a bank account in Victor’s name and attempted to register/annotate the contract; Register of Deeds refused to annotate.
  • Lower Court Proceedings
    • April 23, 1990: petitioner filed a complaint for specific performance and damages (Civil Case No. 3337-V-90).
    • May 1990: Andres Lanozo moved to intervene as alleged tenant-tiller; intervention denied. Case referred to Agrarian branch and then to Branch 172.
    • January 4, 1993: RTC dismissed the complaint, ordered petitioner to pay Victor ₱30,000 attorney’s fees.
    • December 5, 1994: Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC decision in toto.

Issues:

  • Whether the lease-with-option contract terminated upon Encarnacion’s death or binds her heir Victor under Article 1311, Civil Code.
  • Whether petitioner complied with its contractual obligations and requisites for exercising the option.
  • Whether the alleged tenancy of Andres Lanozo affected the validity or enforceability of the contract.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.