Title
Dinamling vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 199522
Decision Date
Jun 22, 2015
A man convicted under RA 9262 for psychological and physical abuse against his partner, including public humiliation and violence, resulting in modified penalties.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 167594)

Facts:

  • Parties and Relationship
    • Ricky Dinamling (petitioner), formerly a policeman, and AAA were in a five-year dating relationship with two common children (ages four and two).
    • AAA had previously suffered physical abuse (head hits, hair-pulling, kicking); earlier police complaints were dismissed as “family problems.”
  • Incident of March 14, 2007
    • Around 7–8 PM, after drinking, Dinamling arrived at AAA’s boarding house with a friend, evicted AAA and the children, accusing her of running a “whore house.” He ordered her to pack in a trash bag and duckling carton.
    • When AAA delayed leaving, Dinamling angrily threw and broke the baby’s feeding bottle outside; he then left with the older child, forcing AAA to seek help to retrieve the children.
  • Incident of March 20, 2007
    • At about 9 PM near CCC’s house, Dinamling shouted at AAA to come out, punched her ear (causing bleeding), kicked her, pulled down her pants and underwear in public, hurled insults, then departed on a motorcycle.
    • The next morning AAA suffered back pain, profuse bleeding, and an incomplete abortion at 19 weeks, leading to a four-day hospitalization.
  • Procedural History
    • Dinamling was charged in two Informations for psychological violence under RA 9262 § 5(i), with pregnancy as an aggravating circumstance.
    • RTC convicted him in both cases, sentencing him to prision mayor; CA affirmed with modification under the Indeterminate Sentence Law.
    • Petitioner sought SC review under Rule 45, contesting factual findings and Dr. Diaz’s testimony on abortion causation.

Issues:

  • Whether the defenses of denial and alibi were erroneously disregarded.
  • Whether Dr. Diaz’s uncertain testimony on abortion causation created reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the SC may re-examine factual findings on certiorari.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.