Title
Diao vs. Martinez
Case
A.C. No. 244
Decision Date
Mar 27, 1963
Telesforo Diao disbarred for falsifying academic credentials in Bar application, failing pre-legal education requirements, undermining legal profession integrity.

Case Digest (A.C. No. 244)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Admission to the Bar and Petition for Disbarment
    • In 1953, Telesforo A. Diao successfully passed the Bar examinations and was admitted to the Philippine Bar.
    • In 1955, Severino Martinez filed a petition alleging that Diao had falsely represented in his application that he had completed the required pre-legal education.
  • Investigation and Respondent’s Answer
    • The Office of the Solicitor General investigated and reported that:
      • Diao did not complete high school as required by the Department of Private Education.
      • Diao never attended Quisumbing College nor obtained an Associate in Arts (A.A.) diploma from that institution, contrary to the credentials he submitted.
    • Diao’s Response:
      • He admitted leaving high school in the third year but claimed U.S. Army service (with a General Classification Test pass) was deemed equivalent to completing high school years three and four.
      • He asserted a clerical “confusion” caused an erroneous certification of an A.A. degree from Quisumbing College, when in fact he obtained an A.A. from Arellano University in April 1949.

Issues:

  • Whether respondent Telesforo A. Diao falsely represented that he completed the required pre-legal education in his Bar application.
  • Whether such false representation, if established, warrants revocation of his admission and disbarment.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.