Title
Del Rosario y Nicolas vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 142295
Decision Date
May 31, 2001
Petitioner acquitted of illegal firearm possession; Supreme Court ruled search warrant invalid, seized items inadmissible, and valid license proven for .45 caliber pistol.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 142295)

Facts:

  • Procedural History
    • June 17, 1996 – Information filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Bulacan, charging Vicente del Rosario y Nicolas with violation of P.D. No. 1866 (illegal possession of firearms).
    • June 25, 1996 – Petitioner arraigned and pleaded not guilty; trial ensued.
    • July 2, 1998 – RTC convicted petitioner; sentenced to 6 months of arresto mayor (minimum) to 6 years prision correccional (maximum) and a ₱15,000 fine.
    • July 9, 1999 – Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed with modification (4 years, 9 months, 11 days prision correccional to 6 years, 8 months, 1 day prision mayor; ₱30,000 fine). Motion for reconsideration denied.
    • April 24, 2000 – Petitioner elevated case to the Supreme Court via petition for certiorari.
  • Underlying Events
    • May 1996 – PNP Criminal Investigation Group received report that petitioner possessed unlicensed firearms; P/Sr. Insp. Edwin C. Roque of the Firearms and Explosives Division certified on May 10, 1996 that “Vicente ‘Vic’ del Rosario of Barangay Bigte” was not licensed.
    • June 13, 1996 – RTC Quezon City, Branch 217 issued a search warrant for petitioner’s residence in Barangay Tigbe, Norzagaray, Bulacan.
    • June 15, 1996 – P/Sr. Insp. Jerito Adique led police to execute the warrant. They found and seized:
      • One .45‐caliber Colt pistol (SN 70G23792), five magazines and 27 live rounds.
      • One .22‐caliber revolver (SN 48673) with 8 live rounds.
      • Five magazines for 5.56 mm rifle and 20 live rounds.
      • Two 2-way radios.
    • Petitioner presented a computerized license for the .45 pistol issued July 13, 1993 (expired January 1995 but stamped extended until renewal) and a permit to carry until January 25, 1996; police refused to accept it. Petitioner claimed the other items were planted and that barangay officials were not present during the search.

Issues:

  • License Validity
    • Did petitioner hold a valid license for the .45‐caliber Colt pistol and its ammunition at the time of seizure?
  • Seizure Legality
    • Were the .22‐caliber revolver, 5.56 mm rifle magazine, and two 2-way radios illegally seized or planted, given that they were not described in the search warrant?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.