Title
Del Rosario vs. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 202481
Decision Date
Sep 8, 2020
Workers sought regularization or challenged illegal dismissal from ABS-CBN; rulings varied on employer-employee relationship, regularization, and dismissal validity.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 202481)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • ABS-CBN’s Corporate Operations
    • ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation is a domestic corporation granted a franchise under R.A. No. 7966 (1987), licensed by the NTC to operate TV and radio stations; its franchise expired May 5, 2020.
    • It employs three main groups for its self-produced, co-produced, line-produced and live-coverage programs:
      • Technical crew (cameramen, audio and sound engineers, VTR men, light men, camera control unit operators) under technical directors and producers.
      • Production staff under Executive and Assistant Producers.
      • OB and PA van drivers for outside broadcast studios.
    • Workers undergo training seminars, receive assignments per show, and are re-hired continuously upon each program’s end; they are paid twice monthly via payroll slips in ABS-CBN’s name, with BIR Form 2316, SSS, PhilHealth and Pag-IBIG contributions.
  • Internal Job Market (IJM) System & Classification
    • In 2002 ABS-CBN introduced the IJM System, accrediting technical and creative manpower as “talents” or independent contractors, paid at hourly rates, without overtime, holiday or rest-day premiums.
    • Workers protested, formed the ABS-CBN IJM Workers’ Union, and filed regularization cases in late 2002–early 2003, alleging forced “accreditation” and loss of employee status.
    • Despite union demands, ABS-CBN reclassified workers under freelance or talent contracts, coerced them to sign new contracts in 2003 and 2007, and summarily dismissed non-signatories between June and September 2010 without notice.
  • Procedural History
    • Twenty-two (22) workers in G.R. No. 202481 and seventy-two (72) in G.R. Nos. 202495–97 sought regularization before the Labor Arbiter; the NLRC and Court of Appeals (CA) issued conflicting rulings.
    • During pendency of regularization actions, twenty (20) workers filed illegal dismissal complaints; some CA divisions declared them regular employees and ordered reinstatement and backwages, others found no employer-employee relationship.
    • On February 27, 2019, the Supreme Court consolidated eight petitions under Rule 45 to resolve common issues.

Issues:

  • Procedural Issues
    • Does the failure to file a motion for reconsideration before the CA render the petitions dismissible?
    • Were the workers guilty of forum shopping by filing illegal dismissal cases during pending regularization proceedings?
    • Is the CA’s reliance on Jalog v. NLRC (minute resolution) binding on these parties?
  • Substantive Issues
    • Did an employer-employee relationship exist between ABS-CBN and the workers?
    • If so, were the workers regular, project, seasonal, casual or independent contractors?
    • Are the workers in the regularization cases entitled to Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) benefits?
    • Were the workers in the illegal dismissal cases unjustly dismissed, and what remedies do they deserve?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.