Title
De Leon vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 112661
Decision Date
May 30, 2001
The employer and its subsidiary were held liable for illegal dismissal and unfair labor practices, mandating the reinstatement of the security guards and full payment of backwages.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 112661)

Facts:

  • A group of petitioners, including Simeon De Leon and 116 others, filed a complaint against the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), Fortune Tobacco Corporation (FTC), and Magnum Integrated Services, Inc. (formerly Fortune Integrated Services, Inc. or FISI).
  • The complaint involved allegations of illegal dismissal, unfair labor practices, and a request for the refund of a cash bond.
  • FTC and FISI entered into a contract for security services on August 23, 1980, with FISI providing security guards for FTC's facilities.
  • FISI changed ownership and was renamed Magnum Integrated Services, Inc. (MISI) on February 1, 1991.
  • FTC terminated its contract with MISI on October 15, 1991, displacing approximately 582 security guards, including the petitioners.
  • The Fortune Tobacco Labor Union sent a Notice of Strike to MISI, but a Regional Trial Court issued an injunction against the picket.
  • The petitioners filed their complaint with the NLRC on November 29, 1991, alleging illegal dismissal and unfair labor practices.
  • The Labor Arbiter initially ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding FTC and FISI to be a single employer.
  • The NLRC later reversed this decision, claiming no employer-employee relationship existed between FTC and the petitioners.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners were illegally dismissed from their employment.
  • The Court found the respondents guilty of unfair labor practices....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the NLRC erred in concluding there was no employer-employee relationship between FTC and the petitioners.
  • The Court applied the "piercing the corporate veil" doctrine, finding that FISI was merely an instrumentality of FTC due to shared stockholders, a common business address, and FISI having no clients other than FTC and its affiliates.
  • The termination of the security services contract was viewed as a strategic move to undermine the newly formed union, constituting an unfair labor practice under Article 248 of the La...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.