Title
Datu vs. Datu
Case
G.R. No. 209278
Decision Date
Sep 15, 2021
Marriage nullified due to husband's schizophrenia, rendering him psychologically incapacitated to fulfill marital obligations; no fraud or collusion found.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 209278)

Facts:

  • Marriage and Nullity Petition
    • Irene Constantino Datu and Alfredo Fabian Datu married civilly on December 15, 1980 in Subic, Zambales, and had two children.
    • On January 3, 2005, Alfredo filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Olongapo City a Complaint for declaration of nullity of marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code for psychological incapacity; the City Prosecutor manifested absence of collusion; Irene filed and amended her Answer.
  • Evidence at Trial
    • Alfredo’s Testimony and Documentary Evidence
      • Discharged from the U.S. Navy after 14 months for psychiatric and medical reasons—diagnosed with schizophrenia (paranoid type).
      • Belief that he is an emissary of God, refusal to work per divine command, left Irene, lives with another woman, no support arrangements beyond child pension.
    • Aunt’s Testimony (Policornia Fabian)
      • Corroborated Alfredo’s schizophrenia diagnosis and discharge.
      • Described Irene as materialistic and jealous; recounted Alfredo’s spiritual messages.
    • Expert Psychological Evaluation (Martha Johanna D. Dela Cruz)
      • Diagnosed Alfredo with schizophrenia, paranoid type; found impaired judgment, incurable psychosis.
      • Evaluated Irene’s refusal letter as indicative of shared psychotic disorder.
    • Irene’s Testimony
      • Former supervisor at Shakey’s Pizza, left work to manage family; separated due to Alfredo’s infidelity.
      • Claimed a support agreement (60% of salary) breached by Alfredo; obtained $400 benefit from U.S. Veterans Affairs for Alfredo’s disability; admitted divergent religious beliefs and her children’s continued relationship with father.
  • RTC Decision and Disposition
    • Findings
      • Alfredo’s psychological incapacity proven by three expert opinions, military and medical certificates, and his delusions preventing essential marital obligations (cohabitation, support, fidelity).
      • Irene’s shared psychotic disorder found post-marriage—thus no juridical antecedence.
    • Disposition
      • Marriage declared null and void due to Alfredo’s psychological incapacity.
      • Alfredo obliged to support the two children; visitation rights preserved.
  • Appeals and Petition for Review
    • Irene’s Motion for New Trial (claims of collusion, conflict of interest, fraud) denied by RTC.
    • Court of Appeals affirmed RTC decision and resolution (Decision September 28, 2012; Resolution September 18, 2013), rejecting allegations of procedural irregularity.
    • Irene filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari before the Supreme Court raising issues of schizophrenia diagnosis, elements of psychological incapacity, and alleged fraud in proceedings.

Issues:

  • Whether respondent Alfredo Fabian Datu indeed suffered from schizophrenia.
  • Whether all elements of psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code have been proven by Alfredo.
  • Whether the trial proceedings were tainted by fraud, warranting reversal of the nullity decision.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.