Case Digest (G.R. No. 219811)
Facts:
Rex Daclison v. Eduardo Baytion, G.R. No. 219811, April 6, 2016, Supreme Court Second Division, Mendoza, J., writing for the Court.On January 27, 2009, Eduardo Baytion filed a complaint for forcible entry and damages (with prayer for preliminary mandatory injunction) in the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch 43, Quezon City, docketed as Civil Case No. 39225, against Rex Daclison. Baytion alleged co-ownership of a 1,500-sq.m. parcel covered by TCT No. 221507 which he administered; a one‑storey building on the parcel had seven stalls, one leased to Leonida Dela Cruz for selling rocks and similar materials. When Leonida’s lease expired in May 2008, Daclison and others allegedly took possession of that stall and used it for a marble/finishing materials business without Baytion’s consent or payment; Baytion demanded vacatur in June 2008 but Daclison refused.
Daclison answered that the disputed area included a filled-up down‑slope created beside the creek after erection of a government riprap, that successive tenants (Antonio, then Leonida, then Ernanie) had possessed and improved the filled portion, that he entered into a business arrangement with Ernanie in February 2008 and paid rental arrears, and that there had been agreements and barangay dealings regarding the boundary and possession.
On August 25, 2009 the MeTC dismissed the forcible entry complaint without prejudice for failure to include co-owners as plaintiffs. Baytion appealed to the Regional Trial Court (RTC). The RTC ruled that the MeTC lacked jurisdiction over a forcible entry summary action because the allegations did not state forcible entry; under Section 8, Rule 40 of the Rules of Court the RTC exercised original jurisdiction and treated the case as an ordinary civil action for recovery of possession, then rendered judgment on April 27, 2012 ordering Daclison and those claiming under him to vacate and directing monthly damages of P20,000 starting May 2008.
Daclison appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA). The CA (Ybanez, J., with Dicdican and Paredes, JJ., concurring) affirmed on February 5, 2015, holding that Baytion had a better right to possession because Daclison was only a sub-lessee and the action had ripened into an accion publiciana/ejectment, and the CA upheld the RTC’s exercise of original jurisdiction unde...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Did the plaintiff, Eduardo Baytion, have the better right to possess the disputed filled‑up portion so as to sustain the forcible entry/accion publiciana relief?
- Was the contested filled‑up portion an accretion or an improvement/accession belonging to Baytion?
- Was dismissal of the complaint required because the leased property had allegedly been surrendered and the dispute therefore moot (and relatedly, was...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)