Case Digest (G.R. No. 176791) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Communities Cagayan, Inc. v. Spouses Arsenio (deceased) and Angeles Nanol, decided on November 14, 2012, petitioner Communities Cagayan, Inc. (formerly Masterplan Properties, Inc.) and respondents Arsenio and Angeles Nanol entered into a Contract to Sell over a residential house and Lots 17 and 19, Block 16, Camella Homes Subdivision, Cagayan de Oro City, for ₱368,000 in 1994. The Nanols declined petitioner’s in-house financing due to high interest and obtained a loan from Capitol Development Bank via a simulated sale, but the bank closed before disbursing the proceeds. On November 30, 1997, they executed a second Contract to Sell with petitioner, availing itself of in-house financing repayable over four years. In 2000, Arsenio demolished the original dwelling and built a three-storey structure valued at approximately ₱3.5 million. After Arsenio’s death in July 2001, Angeles continued the amortizations, but defaulted in 2003. Petitioner sent a notarized Notice of Delinquency Case Digest (G.R. No. 176791) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Parties and Initial Transactions
- Petitioner Communities Cagayan, Inc. (formerly Masterplan Properties, Inc.) and respondents Spouses Arsenio (deceased) and Angeles Nanol entered into a Contract to Sell in 1994 involving a house and Lots 17 and 19, Block 16, Camella Homes Subdivision, Cagayan de Oro City, for ₱368,000.
- Respondents secured a loan from Capitol Development Bank by executing a simulated sale; titles were transferred to their names (TCT Nos. 105202, 105203) but the bank collapsed before releasing funds.
- Second Contract, Improvements, Default
- On November 30, 1997, the parties executed another Contract to Sell for the same property and price, this time availing of petitioner’s in-house financing over four years (1997–2001).
- In 2000, Arsenio demolished the original house and built a three-story structure valued at approximately ₱3.5 million. Arsenio died in July 2001; Angeles continued the amortizations.
- Notices and Litigation
- On September 10, 2003, petitioner issued a notarized Notice of Delinquency and Cancellation for failure to pay installments. An unlawful detainer suit filed in December 2003 was dismissed due to respondents’ registered titles.
- On July 27, 2005, petitioner filed before the RTC, Cagayan de Oro City, Branch 18 (Civil Case No. 2005-158), a Complaint for Cancellation of Title, Recovery of Possession, Reconveyance, and Damages.
- The parties agreed to submit on pleadings and exhibits. On December 29, 2006, the RTC declared the Deed of Absolute Sale void for lack of consideration, cancelled TCT Nos. 105202 and 105203, and ordered respondents to vacate subject to payment of all monthly installments and the value of the new house minus the original house cost. Reconsideration was denied on February 12, 2007.
Issues:
- Whether the RTC erred in ordering petitioner to reimburse respondents the total monthly installments paid.
- Whether the RTC erred in ordering reimbursement of the value of the new house minus the cost of the original house.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)