Case Digest (G.R. No. L-25532) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. William J. Suter “Morcoin” Co., Ltd., G.R. No. L-25532, decided on February 28, 1969, a limited partnership was formed on September 30, 1947, with William J. Suter as general partner and Julia Spirig and Gustav Carlson as limited partners, contributing ₱20,000.00, ₱18,000.00, and ₱2,000.00, respectively. Registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1, 1947, the firm engaged in the importation, marketing, distribution, and operation of phonographs, radios, television sets, and amusement machines. It maintained separate books, bank accounts, invoices, bills, and a Central Bank quota, and had filed income tax returns as a corporation without objection until 1959. That year, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed deficiency income taxes by consolidating the partnership’s earnings with the personal incomes of spouses Suter and Spirig, resulting in a P2,678.06 deficiency for 1954 and P4,567.00 for 1955. Upon protest a Case Digest (G.R. No. L-25532) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Formation and organization of the partnership
- On September 30, 1947, William J. Suter “Morcoin” Co., Ltd., a limited partnership, was organized with:
- William J. Suter as general partner contributing ₱20,000.00
- Julia Spirig and Gustav Carlson as limited partners contributing ₱18,000.00 and ₱2,000.00 respectively
- On October 1, 1947, the partnership was registered with the SEC. It conducted importation, marketing, distribution, and operation of phonographs, radios, television sets, and amusement machines, maintained its own office, books, bank accounts, and secured a Central Bank quota.
- Change in partnership membership
- In 1948, general partner Suter married limited partner Spirig.
- On December 18, 1948, Carlson sold his ₱2,000.00 interest to Suter and Spirig; the sale was recorded with the SEC on December 20, 1948.
- Tax filings and dispute
- From inception until 1959, the limited partnership filed its income tax returns as if it were a corporation, without objection by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
- In 1959 the Commissioner assessed a deficiency against Suter for 1954 (₱2,678.06) and 1955 (₱4,567.00), consolidating the partnership’s income with the individual incomes of Suter and Spirig under Section 45(d), NIRC. Suter protested; CTA reversed the assessment on November 11, 1965. The Commissioner appealed to the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Whether the juridical personality of the limited partnership should be disregarded for income tax purposes, treating the spouses and the partnership as a single taxable unit under Section 45(d), NIRC.
- Whether the 1948 marriage of Suter and Spirig and their acquisition of Carlson’s interest dissolved the limited partnership.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)