Title
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. A. Soriano Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 108576
Decision Date
Jan 20, 1999
CIR petitioned for reversal of the CA ruling which upheld the CTA's decision that A. Soriano Corp's redemption and exchange of stocks isn't equal to taxable dividends under Section 83(b) of the 1939 Revenue Code.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 127823)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Formation and Structure of ANSCOR
    • Don Andres Soriano, a US citizen and resident, formed A. Soriano y Cia in the 1930s, which later became ANSCOR, with an initial capitalization of ₱1,000,000 divided into 10,000 common shares.
    • ANSCOR ownership was wholly controlled by the Soriano family, who are non-resident aliens.
    • Don Andres subscribed to 4,963 shares initially, increasing to 14,963 shares after a 1945 capital increase.
    • Don Andres transferred shares to his foreign sons in 1947.
  • Stock Dividends and Estate Transition
    • Several stock dividends were declared between 1947 and 1963.
    • Upon Don Andres’ death in 1964, his total shares (185,154) were split equally between his estate and widow Doña Carmen as conjugal share.
    • Capital stock was further increased in 1965 and 1966; stock dividends were received by both estate and Doña Carmen, increasing shareholdings.
  • Share Reclassification and Redemptions
    • In 1967-1968, ANSCOR reclassified common shares into common and preferred shares with IRS ruling deeming the exchange not to be tax avoidance.
    • The estate and Doña Carmen exchanged common shares for preferred shares in 1968.
    • ANSCOR redeemed common shares twice from Don Andres’ estate in 1968 and 1969 to reduce foreign exchange remittances if cash dividends were declared.
  • Tax Assessments and Legal Proceedings
    • Revenue examiners proposed deficiency withholding tax for 1968 and 1969 based on stock exchange and redemption transactions.
    • The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) assessed ANSCOR despite claims of tax amnesty under various Presidential Decrees.
    • ANSCOR's protest was denied; petition was filed before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA), which reversed BIR’s ruling.
    • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the CTA's decision.
    • Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) filed the present petition aiming to reverse CA ruling regarding taxability of stock redemption and exchange.
  • Legal Issue
    • Whether ANSCOR’s redemption and exchange of stock is "essentially equivalent to a distribution of taxable dividends" under Section 83(b) of the 1939 Internal Revenue Act, making it taxable.
    • Whether ANSCOR had a duty to withhold tax on the transaction.
    • Whether ANSCOR is covered by tax amnesty decrees.

Issues:

  • Does the redemption and exchange of stocks by ANSCOR constitute an event "essentially equivalent to a distribution of taxable dividend" under Section 83(b) of the 1939 Revenue Act?
  • Is the proceeds from redemption of stock dividends taxable as income to the shareholders?
  • Does ANSCOR’s claim to tax amnesty under Presidential Decrees P.D. 23, 67, and 157 apply in this case?
  • Is ANSCOR liable as a withholding agent for deficiency withholding tax under Sections 53 and 54 of the 1939 Revenue Code on the transactions involving redemption and exchange of stocks?
  • Is the exchange of common shares for preferred shares taxable in this context?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.