Case Digest (G.R. No. 261065) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In G.R. No. 261065, decided on July 10, 2023, Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) sought review of the CTA En Banc ruling that affirmed the CTA First Division’s setting aside of tax assessments against Maxicare Healthcare Corporation. Maxicare, a domestic health maintenance organization, was selected for audit under Letter of Authority No. 126-2014-00000060 dated August 28, 2014, covering its books for January 1 to December 31, 2012. On August 25, 2015, the CIR issued a Preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN) for deficiency VAT amounting to ₱618,251,527.72, which Maxicare protested on September 10, 2015. Thereafter, on October 8, 2015, the CIR issued a Formal Letter of Demand (FLD) and Final Assessment Notice (FAN) reducing the assessment to ₱419,774,484.21. Maxicare’s letter dated November 6, 2015, protested the FLD/FAN as a request for reinvestigation, undertaking to submit all relevant supporting documents within sixty (60) days. Despite this, the CIR prematurely released the Case Digest (G.R. No. 261065) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background
- Maxicare Healthcare Corporation is a domestic corporation organized to operate a prepaid group practice health care delivery system (health maintenance organization).
- On August 28, 2014, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) issued Letter of Authority No. 126-2014-00000060, authorizing the examination of Maxicare’s books and records for all internal revenue taxes for the period January 1 to December 31, 2012.
- Assessment Notices and Administrative Protests
- On August 25, 2015, CIR issued a Preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN) assessing Maxicare for deficiency VAT of ₱618,251,527.72 (inclusive of penalties and surcharges); Maxicare filed a protest on September 10, 2015.
- On October 8, 2015, CIR issued a Formal Letter of Demand and Final Assessment Notice (FLD/FAN) assessing deficiency VAT of ₱419,774,484.21; Maxicare protested by letter dated November 6, 2015, expressly requesting a reinvestigation and committing to submit supporting documents within 60 days.
- Final Decision on Disputed Assessment and CTA First Division Proceedings
- On December 9, 2015, CIR issued the Final Decision on the Disputed Assessment (FDDA), received by Maxicare on December 21, 2015.
- On January 20, 2016, Maxicare filed a Petition for Review with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) First Division (CTA Case No. 9246).
- CTA First Division and En Banc Rulings
- On January 16, 2020, the CTA First Division withdrew and set aside the FDDA, and cancelled the FLD/FAN, holding that CIR violated Maxicare’s due process rights by issuing the FDDA before the 60-day period to submit reinvestigation documents had lapsed.
- On July 21, 2020, the CTA First Division denied CIR’s motion for reconsideration.
- CIR elevated the case to the CTA En Banc, which on November 25, 2021, affirmed the First Division; its April 26, 2022 resolution denied CIR’s motion for reconsideration.
- CIR filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 before the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Main Issue
- Whether the CTA En Banc erred in ruling that CIR violated Maxicare’s right to procedural due process—by issuing the FDDA before the 60-day reinvestigation period under Section 228 of the NIRC, as implemented by RR No. 12-99, had expired—thereby rendering the FLD/FAN and FDDA void.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)