Case Digest (G.R. No. 132624) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Magsaysay Lines, Inc., et al., G.R. No. 146984, decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines, Third Division, on July 28, 2006, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) questioned whether the sale of five 3,700 DWT tween-decker vessels by the National Development Company (NDC) to private respondents—Magsaysay Lines, Inc., Baliwag Navigation, Inc., and FIM Limited of the Marden Group (HK)—was subject to the 10% value-added tax (VAT) under the National Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Pursuant to a government privatization program, NDC offered its wholly-owned subsidiary, National Marine Corporation (NMC), shares and the vessels in one lot for public bidding. On June 3, 1988, the winning bid of P168 million was submitted by Magsaysay Lines on behalf of a new company formed with the other private respondents. The privatization committee issued a Notice of Award on July 1, 1988, and the Contract of Sale was executed on September 28, 1988, st Case Digest (G.R. No. 132624) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Privatization and Assets for Sale
- National Development Company (NDC) decided to privatize its wholly-owned subsidiary, National Marine Corporation (NMC), by selling all NMC shares and five 3,700 DWT Tween-Decker vessels in one lot.
- The vessels were constructed between 1981 and 1984, initially leased to Luzon Stevedoring Company and later on a bareboat basis to NMC.
- Bidding and Contract
- Public auction terms required the winning bidder to pay a 10% value-added tax (VAT) on the vessels’ value.
- On June 3, 1988, Magsaysay Lines, Inc. (for itself, Baliwag Navigation, Inc., and FIM Limited) bid ₱168,000,000; received Notice of Award on July 1, 1988.
- Contract of Sale executed September 28, 1988, with clause 11.02 stating: “value-added tax, if any, shall be for the account of the PURCHASER.” An irrevocable letter of credit secured VAT payment.
- Administrative Rulings and Payment
- BIR issued VAT Ruling No. 568-88 (December 14, 1988), holding the sale subject to 10% VAT; reiteration in Ruling No. 007-89 (February 24, 1989).
- NDC drew on the letter of credit and paid ₱15,120,000 VAT on March 16, 1989.
- Private respondents filed for refund with the CTA (April 10, 1989; supplemental July 14, 1989) and separately with the BIR (July 13, 1989).
- Judicial Proceedings
- CTA Decision (April 27, 1992): sale was an isolated transaction, not in NDC’s trade/business course; not a “deemed sale”; VAT refund granted.
- Court of Appeals Decision (March 11, 1997): reversed CTA, deeming the sale a VAT-able “deemed sale” (change of ownership of business).
- CA Resolution (February 5, 2001): upon reconsideration, affirmed CTA; held “change of ownership” must accompany retirement/cessation; sale outside VAT.
- CIR elevated the case to the Supreme Court under G.R. No. 146984.
Issues:
- Whether the sale of the five vessels by NDC to private respondents is subject to 10% VAT under the 1986 Tax Code.
- Whether “deemed sale” provisions (Section 100 of the Tax Code; Section 4 of RR No. 5-87) apply regardless of whether a sale occurs “in the course of trade or business” under Section 99.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)