Title
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Lincoln Philippine Life Insurance Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 119176
Decision Date
Mar 19, 2002
In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lincoln Philippine Life Insurance Co., Inc., the Supreme Court of the Philippines upholds the deficiency stamp tax assessment on an insurance policy with an "automatic increase clause," ruling that the increase in insurance coverage is subject to documentary stamp taxes.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 119176)

Facts:

  • The case involves the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (petitioner) and Lincoln Philippine Life Insurance Co., Inc. (now Jardine-CMA Life Insurance Company, Inc.) (private respondent).
  • The dispute centers on a special life insurance policy known as the "Junior Estate Builder Policy," which included an "automatic increase clause" effective in 1984.
  • This clause provided for an automatic increase in insurance coverage upon the insured reaching a certain age, without issuing a new policy.
  • Initially, the private respondent paid documentary stamp taxes based on the initial sum assured.
  • In 1984, the Commissioner issued a deficiency documentary stamp tax assessment for the automatic increase in insurance coverage.
  • Additionally, the private respondent issued 50,000 shares of stock dividends with a par value of P100.00 per share, totaling P5,000,000.00, but paid documentary stamp taxes based only on the par value, not the book value of P19,307,500.00.
  • The Commissioner issued a deficiency assessment for both the insurance policy and the stock dividends.
  • The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) nullified the deficiency tax assessments.
  • The Court of Appeals (CA) partially affirmed the CTA's decision, upholding the nullification of the assessment on the insurance policy but reversing it concerning the stock dividends.
  • The Commissioner petitioned the Supreme Court to review the CA's decision regarding the insurance policy.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. The Supreme Court ruled that the "automatic increase clause" is not a separate agreement but an integral part of the original insurance policy.
  2. The Court held that the documentary stamp tax should be compu...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reasoned that the "automatic increase clause" was already part of the insurance policy at the time of its issuance, making it unnecessary to execute a separate agreement for the increase in coverage.
  • According to Section 173 of the National Internal Revenue Code, the payment of documentary stamp taxes is required at the time the transaction is made, and the tax base under Section 183 is the amount fixed in the policy.
  • The Court clarified that the amount fixed in the policy include...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.