Case Digest (G.R. No. 168987)
Facts:
This case involves the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) as petitioner, and Central Vegetable Oil Manufacturing Co., Inc. (CENVOCO), along with the Court of Appeals (CA) and the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) as respondents, adjudicated by the Supreme Court on February 23, 1999. In 1986, CENVOCO, a manufacturer of edible and coconut/copra meal products subject to a 3% miller's tax, purchased containers and packaging materials for its products and paid a 10% sales tax on these items. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) later conducted an investigation and issued a deficiency assessment notice against CENVOCO for P1,575,514.70 as unpaid miller's tax for 1986. CENVOCO requested reconsideration, arguing that the sales tax paid on packaging materials should be credited against the miller's tax due, since packaging materials are not "raw materials or supplies used in the milling process" per Section 168 of the National Internal Revenue Code (Tax Code). The BIR
...
Case Digest (G.R. No. 168987)
Facts:
- Parties and Subject Matter
- Petitioner: Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR)
- Respondent: Central Vegetable Oil Manufacturing Co., Inc. (CENVOCO)
- The case concerns deficiency miller’s tax assessment for the year 1986 and whether sales tax paid on containers and packaging materials can be credited against the miller’s tax due.
- Background and Transactions
- CENVOCO manufactures edible and coconut/copra meal cake and other coconut-related products subject to miller’s tax of 3%. It also manufactures lard, detergent, and laundry soap subject to 10% sales tax.
- In 1986, CENVOCO purchased containers and packaging materials and paid sales tax on these items.
- The BIR, after investigation, issued Assessment Notice No. FAS-B-86-88-001661-001664 dated April 22, 1988, assessing deficiency miller’s tax of P1,575,514.70 against CENVOCO.
- CENVOCO filed letters for reconsideration arguing that sales tax paid on containers and packaging materials should be credited against the miller’s tax due, claiming these materials are not “raw materials used in the milling process” under Section 168 of the Tax Code.
- The Deputy Commissioner of the BIR denied the claim based on the proviso in Section 168 disallowing credits for taxes paid on raw materials or supplies used in the milling process. The BIR posited there is no provision allowing credits for taxes paid on containers and packaging materials.
- CENVOCO filed a petition for review with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). The CTA ruled in favor of CENVOCO holding that containers and packaging materials are not raw materials used in the milling process, thus the sales tax paid thereon can be credited against the miller’s tax due.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the CTA’s decision in toto.
- CIR filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari before the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Whether the sales tax paid by CENVOCO on containers and packaging materials for its milled products can be credited against the deficiency miller’s tax assessed for the year 1986.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)