Title
Collector of Internal Revenue vs. Anglo California National Bank
Case
G.R. No. L-12476
Decision Date
Jan 29, 1960
Calamba Sugar Estate Inc., a foreign corporation, sold shares and a promissory note in California. The Supreme Court ruled the capital gains were sourced outside the Philippines, exempting them from Philippine income tax.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 184836)

Facts:

  • Parties and Corporate Status
    • Respondent: Calamba Sugar Estate Inc., a foreign corporation
      • Organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, U.S.A.
      • Licensed on May 18, 1946, to do business in the Philippines
      • Represented in the Philippines by its resident attorney-in-fact
    • Petitioner: Collector of Internal Revenue
      • Initiated an assessment for alleged deficiency income taxes
  • Tax Assessment Details
    • Assessment Dates and Periods
      • Assessment dated May 14, 1956
      • Periods covered: 1953, 1954, and 1955
    • Amounts Alleged
      • P138,855.00 for 1953
      • P131,759.00 for 1954
      • P393,459.00 for 1955
    • Alleged Source of Deficiency
      • Based on capital gains derived from the sale
        • The sale of 250,000 shares of the capital stock of Pampanga Sugar Mills (a domestic corporation)
        • The sale of a promissory note, dated January 1, 1950, executed by the Pampanga Sugar Mills in the sum of $500,000.00
  • Transaction and Procedural Background
    • Transaction Details
      • Sale executed on January 16, 1953, between Calamba Sugar Estate Inc. and Pasumil Planters, Inc.
      • Negotiations conducted in San Francisco, California
      • Payments for the sale made in San Francisco, California
      • Sale executed under and in accordance with the laws of California
    • Corporate Dissolution and Licensing
      • Securities and Exchange Commission cancelled the respondent’s license on December 16, 1955
      • Corporation dissolved on December 30, 1955 under California law
  • Previous Judicial Decisions
    • Initial Ruling by the Collector of Internal Revenue
      • Imposed deficiency income tax assessments on capital gains
    • Ruling by the Court of Tax Appeals
      • Reversed the Collector’s ruling
      • Absolved the respondent from liability for the alleged deficiency tax
  • Relevant Legal and Factual Clarifications
    • Nature of Shares
      • Shares of stock are considered intangible personal properties
      • Cited supporting legal references: Art. 417 (2) of the Civil Code of the Philippines and Sec. 35, Act No. 1459
    • Specific Tax Code Provisions Involved
      • Section 24 of the National Internal Revenue Code: Taxes on income of foreign corporations only from sources within the Philippines
      • Section 37(e) of the same Code or its equivalent in the 1934 Act (Sec. 119(e) of the 1934 Act): Determines the situs of capital gains from the sale of personal properties
    • United States Jurisprudence Influences
      • U.S. decisions such as East Coast Oil Co. vs. Comm., Disconto-Gaesellcraft vs. U.S. Steel Corporation, and Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas vs. Collector
      • Emphasis on the place of sale and the passing of title as decisive in the determination of situs

Issues:

  • Determination of the Source of Income
    • Whether the capital gains obtained from the sale of shares and the promissory note are considered income from sources within or without the Philippines.
    • Specific concern on the application of Section 24 (income tax on foreign corporations) and Section 37(e) (situs of capital gains) of the National Internal Revenue Code.
  • Characterization and Situs of the Property
    • The classification of shares of stock as intangible personal properties and the implications thereof.
    • Whether the situs of the capital gains should be based on the location where the sale was consummated versus the domicile of the corporation.
  • Procedural and Administrative Concerns
    • The effect of the requirement under Section 35 of the Corporation Law (Act No. 1459) regarding the registration of the transfer.
    • Distinction between the situs of the property itself and the situs of the income derived from the sale.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.