Title
City of Iriga vs. Camarines Sur III Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 192945
Decision Date
Sep 5, 2012
CASURECO III, an electric cooperative, contested local franchise taxes assessed by Iriga City, claiming exemption under CDA registration. The Supreme Court ruled it liable, citing LGC withdrawal of PD 269 tax privileges and improper CA appeal.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 192945)

Facts:

  • Background and Parties
    • CASURECO III is an electric cooperative organized under Presidential Decree (PD) No. 269, registered with the National Electrification Administration (NEA).
    • It operates electric power distribution to consumers in Iriga City and several neighboring municipalities of Camarines Sur Province, collectively known as the Rinconada area.
  • Events Leading to Dispute
    • In 2003, the City of Iriga (petitioner) required CASURECO III to submit reports of its gross receipts covering 1997 to 2002 for the purpose of computing franchise taxes, fees, and other charges.
    • CASURECO III complied and was assessed local franchise taxes based on the submitted reports.
    • On January 7, 2004, the City of Iriga demanded payment of franchise taxes due for 1998-2003 and real property taxes for 1995-2003.
    • CASURECO III refused, claiming exemption from local taxes as a cooperative provisionally registered with the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA).
  • Litigation History
    • On March 15, 2004, the City of Iriga filed a complaint before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Iriga City to collect local taxes from CASURECO III, citing its taxing authority under the Local Government Code (LGC) and city revenue code.
    • The RTC found:
      • Real property taxes for 1995-1999 had prescribed based on Section 194 of the LGC.
      • CASURECO III was liable for franchise taxes for 2000-2003 based on its gross receipts from Iriga City and the Rinconada area.
    • CASURECO III appealed only the RTC ruling on franchise tax liability.
  • Court of Appeals (CA) Ruling
    • The CA reversed the RTC decision, ruling that CASURECO III, being a non-profit entity, was not a "business" subject to franchise tax under Section 137 of the LGC.
    • The CA held that CASURECO III’s non-profit status excluded it from businesses “enjoying a franchise”.
    • The CA denied the City’s motion for reconsideration due to a late filing.
  • Present Petition to the Supreme Court
    • The City of Iriga filed a petition under Rule 45 seeking to set aside the CA Decision and Resolution and to reinstate the RTC ruling.

Issues:

  • Whether an electric cooperative registered under PD 269 but not under Republic Act (RA) 6938 is liable to pay local franchise taxes.
  • Whether the situs of taxation for franchise tax purposes is the place where the franchise holder exercises its franchise, irrespective of where services or goods are delivered.
  • (Raised by CASURECO III) Whether the CA Decision had already attained finality due to an untimely motion for reconsideration.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.