Case Digest (G.R. No. 127383) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In The City of Davao, City Treasurer and City Assessor of Davao City v. The Regional Trial Court, Branch XII, Davao City and the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), G.R. No. 127383, decided on August 18, 2005, the GSIS Davao branch received on April 8, 1994 a Notice of Public Auction scheduling the sale of its Matina and Ulas properties for non-payment of 1992–1994 realty taxes amounting to ₱295,721.61. The sale was reset when Davao City extended the payment deadline, but on July 28, 1994 the GSIS was served with Warrants and Notices of Levy on its three land parcels, followed by a second auction notice dated August 29, 1994, for sale on September 20, 1994. On September 13, 1994, GSIS filed a petition for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and declaratory relief with the RTC, sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) and was raffled to Branch 12. That same day the RTC issued a 20-day TRO, halting the scheduled auction, and on April 3, 1995 granted a writ of preliminary i Case Digest (G.R. No. 127383) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background of Tax Assessments
- On April 8, 1994, the GSIS Davao City branch received a Notice of Public Auction for three GSIS-owned parcels in Matina and Ulas, Davao City, due to non-payment of real property taxes for 1992–1994 amounting to ₱295,721.61.
- The auction was reset following a deadline extension by Davao City. On July 28, 1994, GSIS received Warrants and Notices of Levy; another auction notice set the sale on September 20, 1994.
- Proceedings in the Regional Trial Court
- On September 13, 1994, GSIS filed a Petition for Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus, and/or Declaratory Relief (with TRO) before RTC Branch 12, challenging the levies and auction.
- The RTC issued a 20-day temporary restraining order (TRO) on September 13, 1994, and on April 3, 1995, granted a writ of preliminary injunction for the suit’s duration.
- Parties stipulated that the sole issue was whether Sections 193 and 294 (withdrawal of GOCC tax exemptions) and related LGC provisions repealed GSIS’s tax exemption under Section 33 of P.D. No. 1146, as amended by P.D. No. 1981.
- RTC Decision and Denial of Reconsideration
- On May 28, 1996, the RTC held that GSIS’s tax exemption survived the LGC, voided the warrants of levy, and enjoined further auction and title annotations.
- GSIS’s Motion for Reconsideration was denied on October 30, 1996. Petitioners elevated the case to the Supreme Court on pure questions of law.
Issues:
- Did the Local Government Code (R.A. No. 7160), particularly Sections 193, 232, 234, and 534(f), effectively withdraw GSIS’s real property tax exemption granted under Section 33 of P.D. No. 1146, as amended by P.D. No. 1981?
- Are the conditionalities in the second paragraph of Section 33, P.D. No. 1146 (requiring an express repeal and a substitute policy for solvency), valid constraints on the legislative power of future Congresses?
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)