Case Digest (G.R. No. 158830) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Ellan Marie P. Cipriano v. Commission on Elections, petitioner Ellan Marie P. Cipriano, a minor represented by her father Rolando Cipriano, filed on June 7, 2002 her Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) Chairman of Barangay 38, Pasay City. On July 15, 2002, despite her name remaining on the official list, the COMELEC en banc issued Resolution No. 5363, motu proprio canceling her COC on the ground that she was not a registered voter in the barangay where she intended to run. Nonetheless, petitioner voted in the July 15 SK elections, was proclaimed SK Chairman, and took her oath on August 14, 2002. On August 19, she filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that under Section 78 of the Omnibus Election Code her COC could only be canceled upon a proper petition and after notice and hearing. On October 7, 2002, the COMELEC en banc, by Resolution No. 5781, reaffirmed its motu proprio policy—based on earlier resolutions (Nos. 4801, 5584 and 5666)—to deny d Case Digest (G.R. No. 158830) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Filing of Certificate of Candidacy and COMELEC Motu Proprio Action
- On June 7, 2002, Ellan Marie P. Cipriano filed her Certificate of Candidacy as Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) Chairman, Barangay 38, Pasay City.
- On July 15, 2002—the day of the SK elections—the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) en banc issued Resolution No. 5363, motu proprio cancelling petitioner's certificate of candidacy for alleged failure to be a registered voter in the barangay.
- Conduct of Election and Initial Proclamation
- Despite Resolution No. 5363, petitioner was allowed to vote, her name remained on the official list, and after canvassing she was proclaimed duly elected SK Chairman by the Barangay Board of Canvassers.
- Petitioner took her oath of office on August 14, 2002.
- Motion for Reconsideration and COMELEC’s Policy Resolutions
- On August 19, 2002, petitioner moved for reconsideration, contending that cancellation must follow a petition under Sec. 78, Omnibus Election Code, with notice and hearing, and that the COMELEC en banc lacked original jurisdiction.
- On October 7, 2002, COMELEC issued Resolution No. 5781, affirming its policy (per Resolutions No. 4801 and 5584, later amended by No. 5666) of motu proprio cancellation of certificates for nonregistered voters, and directing deletion of names and reconvening of canvassers.
- Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court
- Petitioner sought to set aside COMELEC Resolutions Nos. 5363 and 5781 as void for lack of due process and for exceeding COMELEC’s authority.
- The sole legal issue framed was whether COMELEC, in exercising its administrative power, may motu proprio cancel a certificate of candidacy without notice, hearing, or a petition under the Omnibus Election Code.
Issues:
- Whether the COMELEC may, on its own initiative and without resort to a petition under Sec. 78 of the Omnibus Election Code, cancel a duly filed certificate of candidacy.
- Whether such motu proprio cancellation without prior notice and hearing violates the candidate’s right to due process.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)