Title
CICL XXXvs. People
Case
G.R. No. 238798
Decision Date
Mar 14, 2023
Minor offender convicted of homicide despite minority; Court affirms conviction finding he acted with discernment, clarifies burden of proof and guidelines for such cases.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 238798)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Antecedents
    • On October 27, 2003, AAA testified against minor CICL XXX (17 years old) in a barangay hearing on a mauling complaint filed by DDD.
    • Around 3:00 a.m. on October 28, 2003, BBB (AAA’s mother) and her husband found AAA lying outside their gate with a bloodied face and eyes. AAA, under shock, told them CICL XXX and a companion struck him with a blunt instrument.
  • Medical course and death
    • October 29–30, 2003: AAA developed dizziness; CT scan revealed severe brain contusions and bleeding. He was transferred to Baguio General Hospital, where physicians found massive cerebral contusions, lacerations, and bruises.
    • January 27, 2004: AAA discharged in a vegetative state; bedridden for five years. November 26, 2008: AAA died of metabolic encephalopathy secondary to blunt head trauma.
  • Criminal proceedings
    • March 2, 2004: RTC Information charged CICL XXX with frustrated murder, later amended to homicide upon AAA’s death.
    • 2005–2011: Prosecution presented witnesses (barangay officer, police officer, three doctors, AAA’s mother and sister). Defense presented CICL XXX and his guardian, YYY, who testified he was drinking that night and later worked as a guide in Sagada.
  • Lower court rulings
    • February 28, 2014 (RTC): Convicted CICL XXX of homicide; sentenced to 8 years & 1 day prision mayor (minimum) to 14 years 8 months & 1 day reclusion temporal (maximum); ordered damages.
    • November 29, 2017 (CA): Affirmed but modified penalty to 6 months & 1 day prision correccional (minimum) to 8 years & 1 day prision mayor (maximum); adjusted damages and remanded for RA 9344 disposition.

Issues:

  • Whether the CA erred in admitting AAA’s statements to his mother as part of the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule.
  • Whether AAA’s death was proximately caused by CICL XXX’s assault or by delayed/inadequate medical treatment.
  • Whether the elements of homicide were established against CICL XXX.
  • Whether CICL XXX acted with discernment—exempting him from criminal liability under Section 6 of RA 9344.
  • Whether the failure to allege and discuss discernment in the Information and RTC decision required acquittal.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.