Title
Chipoco vs. Office of the Ombudsman
Case
G.R. No. 239416
Decision Date
Jul 24, 2019
Public officials in the Philippines were charged with violating anti-graft laws and falsifying documents in a fraudulent bidding scheme for a motor vehicle, with the Court upholding the Ombudsman's decision.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 239416)

Facts:

  • Petition for certiorari filed by Melchor J. Chipoco and others against the Office of the Ombudsman.
  • Events began on November 26, 2010, when Mayor Wilfredo S. Balais sold a 2001 Nissan Patrol Wagon to Eduardo A. Ayunting for P500,000.
  • On January 28, 2011, Ayunting sold the vehicle to the Municipality of Labason for P960,000.
  • On August 1, 2011, the Sangguniang Bayan of Labason passed Resolution No. 117, allowing Balais to negotiate the rescission of the sale due to its disadvantageous nature.
  • A complaint was filed with the Ombudsman on August 22, 2011, alleging violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and the Government Procurement Reform Act against the petitioners and other officials.
  • The Ombudsman found probable cause against Balais, Go, and Ayunting for violations of the Anti-Graft Law.
  • Ayunting later became a state witness, leading to a new complaint on February 5, 2016, implicating other local officials.
  • On December 8, 2017, the Ombudsman issued a resolution finding probable cause to charge the petitioners with violations of the Anti-Graft Law and the Revised Penal Code.
  • The petitioners' motion for reconsideration was denied, prompting their appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, affirming the Ombudsman's resolution and order.
  • The Court found no grave abuse of discretion in the Ombudsman...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court stated that the Ombudsman has broad investigatory and prosecutorial powers, free from external influence.
  • The standard for probable cause is a reasonable belief that a crime has occurred, not absolute certainty.
  • The Ombudsman demonstrated that the petitioners acted with manifest partiality and gross negli...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.