Title
Chico vs. Ciudadano
Case
G.R. No. 249815
Decision Date
Jul 4, 2022
Petitioner acquired land via tax delinquency sale; respondent, claiming prior ownership, successfully annulled judgment due to extrinsic fraud, lack of jurisdiction, and exclusion as indispensable party.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 97898)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Antecedents
    • April 10, 2012 – Petitioner Gloria A. Chico filed a Petition for Issuance of a New Title under P.D. No. 1529, §§ 75 & 107, alleging she was the highest bidder in the July 8, 2010 tax delinquency sale of the land covered by TCT No. 57394 (PR-11986) registered in the name of Rosalita G. Bengzon. She claimed the one-year redemption period lapsed and attached thereto copies of:
      • TCT No. 57394 (PR-11986) and tax declaration;
      • Warrant and notice of levy;
      • July 30, 2010 Certificate of Sale;
      • January 12, 2012 Final Bill of Sale;
      • Property identification map.
    • Notices of hearing were served on Chico, her counsel, the OSG, LRA, RD-Quezon City, City Prosecutor and City Attorney, and posted publicly.
  • RTC proceedings and decisions
    • May 24, 2012 – RTC Branch 83 declared general default; no opposition filed.
    • December 10, 2012 Decision – RTC granted the petition, ordered cancellation of TCT No. 57394 (PR-11986), issuance of new TCT to Chico and issuance of a writ of possession to eject occupants. RD-QC cancelled the old title and issued TCT No. 004-2016005243 in Chico’s name.
    • June 27, 2013 Amended Decision – corrected title number to “57394 (PR-11986).” Certificate of finality issued April 7, 2015. Chico pursued writ of possession (LRC Case No. R-QZN-16-08936-LR).
  • Petition for Annulment of Judgment before the CA
    • January 16, 2017 – Respondent Elsie Ciudadano filed a petition under Rule 47, alleging she bought the property by a June 23, 1989 Deed of Absolute Sale (annotated on TCT No. 57394 in June 1989), has possessed it since 1992, and was never impleaded nor served notice in the issuance-of-new-title case. She invoked extrinsic fraud and lack of jurisdiction.
    • April 5, 2019 CA Decision – granted annulment petition, set aside the RTC’s December 2012 and June 2013 decisions, declared Chico’s TCT No. 004-2016005243 void, and reinstated TCT No. 57394 (PR-11986) in Bengzon’s name.
    • October 8, 2019 Resolution – denied Chico’s motion for reconsideration.

Issues:

  • Whether the CA erred in giving due course to a petition for annulment of judgment under Rule 47 as an extraordinary remedy.
  • Whether Ciudadano’s petition constituted a collateral attack on Chico’s Torrens title.
  • Whether the CA correctly found extrinsic fraud and lack of jurisdiction in the RTC’s decisions granting cancellation and issuance of a new title.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.